You are browsing the archive for 2011 November.

Tasty Steak House (Taiwan)

November 15, 2011 in Food, Reviews, Taiwan, Travel

Western-style steak houses that have become very popular in Taiwan, and Tasty is one of the most successful, with 13 and counting franchises in Taipei city alone.  For a very reasonable price (NT$499 + 10% service charge) you can get a set meal including an appetizer, an antipasto, soup, a main dish (like a steak or chicken or fish), dessert and a beverage.

I had been to Tasty before and considered it quite pleasant, but for whatever reason always forgot to bring my camera.  This time, I finally remembered.

This particular Tasty is on Nanjing East Road, and while I assume the decor of each store is slightly different, this one was clean and modern with plenty of booths and comfy seats.  The menu is pretty standard — you more or less have to have the set meal, and you must choose one of each course.  Some courses only have a couple of options, and since we went in a group of 4, we got to sample quite a variety.

There are too many food photos so I have grouped them into galleries/slide shows.

First up, the appetizers.

We got both options: shrimps and asparagus and the fresh seasonal vegetables (fish tartar and fruit jelly).

Both were very good.  The shrimp and asparagus came with this tangy curry yoghurt sauce which was just right, and the fish tartar and fruit jelly complemented each other well.  An auspicious start.

Secondly, the antipasti.

Again, we got both available options, the baked mushroom with garlic and cheese plus toast, and the Danish pastry baked with beef.

To be honest I was starting to get a little full after the second course, which was excellent but on the heavier side due to all the cheese and cream.

Thirdly, the salads.

We went with all four options: the fresh shrimp and potato salad, the fruit salad, the Romaine hearts salad and fruit jelly tower.

All good, especially the shrimp and potato salad, which was my favourite.  The fruit jelly tower was pretty and and tasty.

Fourth, the soups.

We got the Italian seafood soup, the cream chowder, and the chicken and mushroom soup.

None of the soups really stood out for me.  But then again, they came as part of a large set, so I didn’t expect much.

Then before the mains we got a little palette cleanser called a sawa, which is essentially a fruity vinegar shot.

Finally, the mains.

We got a fish + steak combo, a chicken and a steak.

The mains were, I must say, better than I thought they would be.  Usually when you get a piece of meat at a restaurant like this it’s not particularly good, but at Tasty both the chicken and steak were tender and juicy and the fish was crispy and moist on the inside.  A pleasant surprise.

For dessert, we got the French creme brulee, the panna cotta and the chocolate cake.

 

They all looked good but for true appreciators of dessert I admit Tasty‘s were average at best.  The highlight was the creme brulee.

In summary, Tasty lives up to its name — while nothing was ‘wow’, you do get lots of variety, every dish was solid, and you do get decent bang for your buck.  I’d recommend it for group gatherings and for the times you feel ravenous.

7.5 out of 10!

Details:

To find the nearest store to you, check out the website here (it’s in Chinese but a simple Google translation will give you what you need), which includes addresses, maps, opening hours, phone numbers and directions from the relevant MRT station.

Pacquiao-Marquez III: Close, Controversial Pacquiao Win

November 13, 2011 in Boxing, Sport

Does this look like the face of a winner?

Seems like some things will never change.  Few people believed that the old adage ‘styles make fights’ would apply every single time, but once again it prevailed tonight.

Despite what many expected would be a brutal annihilation, Manny Pacquiao just won a close, controversial majority decision over arch rival Juan Manuel Marquez (114-114, 115-113, 116-112).

Plenty of people thought Marquez won the first two fights, in 2004 and 2008, and the same will be said for fight number three.  I’ve only watched the fight once, but I had it a 114-114 draw.  However, I cannot begrudge anyone for thinking this was a 115-114, 115-113 or 116-114 fight in Marquez’s favour.  In fact, when I heard the scores being announced, I had a feeling that perhaps an upset was written in the stars.

Honestly, it was that difficult to score.  Several boxing analysts on ESPN had it a draw.  Some had Pacquiao winning by one round.  Others said it was another robbery.  Certainly, from the boos that showered the ring immediately after the decision was announced and Marquez left the ring in disgust (in fact, objects were being showered too), it appears many ringsiders felt the same.  I was also just on the ESPN message board and the overwhelming sentiment is that Pacquiao should have lost.  Not sure if it is just the anti-Pacquiao or pro-Mayweather trolls but it is what it is.

I watched the fight via online streaming, and it was commentated by a British station which featured Pacquiao stablemate Amir Khan.  Interestingly, they had Marquez winning the fight, and winning it easily, and Khan even said before the decision was announced that he’d be open to fighting Marquez if Pacquiao loses.  I’d be very fascinated to see how the commentators from other stations called the fight (apparently Harold Lederman from HBO had it 116-112 for Pacquiao).

If you have watched the fight with the commentary on, I suggest watching it again without any commentary — because they tend to be very misleading.  Watch the fight without the views and opinions of others and decide for yourself.  Did Pacquiao earn the victory or was Marquez robbed (again)?

Fight analysis

Pacquiao weighed 143 and Marquez weighed142 at the weigh-in the day before.  Both were under the catch weight limit of 144 pounds.  Marquez looked huge, at least as big as Pacquiao, and in contrast with his fight against Mayweather, his midsection was much more taut.  Pacquiao, as usual, looked ripped and fantastic.

Unlike the previous two fights, this one was more technical and more of a chess match.  No knockdowns but still a brilliant and exciting fight from start to finish.

To be fair, Pacquiao did look a lot more cautious in the earlier rounds and he appeared utterly confused at times.  He simply didn’t know how to solve Marquez’s style.  He didn’t throw as many combinations as I thought he would, or perhaps it was Marquez’s counterpunching that discouraged him from doing so.

Marquez, to his credit, bulked up successfully this time and fought using a perfect game plan.  He stood his ground, throwing jabs and rapid combinations to unsettle Pacquaio, and when Pacquiao unloaded a shot Marquez simply took a step back to get out of range, and then immediately followed with a counter combination in return.  He also threw some hard body combos, especially earlier in the fight.

To the casual observer it might appear as though Marquez was the more successful fighter throughout, but Pacquiao, who was clearly the aggressor in the latter stages of the fight, did block a lot of the combos and landed a few hard shots of his own.

I gave the first round, a ‘feel-out’ round, to Pacquiao, who was more aggressive and landed the better shots.  From there, Marquez won most of the rounds up to the midway mark, prompting Freddie Roach to tell Pacquiao in between rounds that he was behind and had to pick it up.  Pacquiao listened to his trainer and increased his work rate, but Marquez still fought very efficiently.  Those second-half rounds became very hard to score, and even if most of them they went to Pacquiao they were still extremely close rounds.  I had the fight dead even at the end of round 10.  The last two rounds were practically a wash.  I had Pacquiao winning the 11th and Marquez the 12th, but they could have easily been the other way around (two of the three judges gave the last round to Pacquiao).

When the fight ended, Marquez raised an arm in victory, and Pacquiao retreated to his corner to pray.  Boxers in close fights always think they won, but upon seeing that scene I thought maybe Marquez did achieve the upset after all.  When the first score was announced, 114-114, I thought we were on our way to a majority draw.  I still thought it might end up a draw when they announced the second score, 115-113.  The third score, 116-112, raised an eyebrow.  The fight was too close to deserve that scoreline.

I think a draw would have been the right result, but I couldn’t fault judges for a 2-point swing in either direction.  Perhaps Pacquiao, with his reputation as the reigning champ and P4P king, had enough influence, subconscious or not, to pull the judges to rule in his favour.

Post-fight quotes

Marquez:

“This is the second robbery of the two that we had, and I think this was even more clear than the first.  We won with the clearer punches. The audience protested because they saw us win again. I thought I got robbed. It happens again and again. I don’t know what else I can do to win.”

“It’s hard when you’re fighting your rival and the three judges, too.”

Nacho Beristain (Marquez’s trainer):

“I’ve always confided in this commission here, but this has been a robbery in the utmost.”

Pacquiao:

“The fans of Marquez, of course, aren’t happy, but my fans are happy.  I clearly won the fight. He is a good fighter, but I do my best. It is very clear that I won the fight.”

“He was ready for my punches.  I thought I blocked a lot of his punches.”

Re Mayweather: ”Anytime, anytime, I am a fighter. My job is to fight.”

“Let’s get it on,  Let’s make the fight happen and give the people a good fight.”

Freddie Roach (Pacquiao’s trainer):

“It was a very close fight. It could have gone either way.  I asked Manny to move to the right and he didn’t.”

Punch stats

Those suggesting a robbery might want to take a look at the punch stats.  Of course, they are not fully accurate and are open to interpretation, but according to Compubox Pacquiao landed 176/578 punches (30%), while Marquez landed 138/436 (32%).

Pacquiao also had the edge in power punches, 117/274 (43%) to 100/254 (39%).

Per round, Pacquiao averaged 14 of 49 punches, Marquez averaged 11 of 36.

Not to say that this is proof of a Pacquiao victory, because it is not, but it does add weight to the suggestion that this was a close fight that could have gone either way.

Where to from here?

Bob Arum, Pacquiao’s promoter (and Marquez’s promoter for this one fight) has suggested a fourth fight between the two in May to decide once and for all who is the better fighter.  I dunno.  I thought this fight would be it.  They could fight 100 times and the result might be the same every time.

I say let Pacquiao fight someone else (ah hem, MAYWEATHER — who must have loved the result and might finally be willing to take the fight now given how it turned out) and regardless of whether he wins or loses, and if Marquez is willing, let their fourth fight be the last of Pacquiao’s career and let him ride off into the sunset.

Mayweather recently announced through a spokesperson that his next fight is in May, and they alluded to the ‘little fella’ as his next opponent, which everyone assumes is Pacquiao.

As for the drug testing problems that have derailed two prior negotiations?  Both Pacquiao and Arum have said it is not a problem anymore.  Pacquiao is now willing to be subjected to Olympic style blood testing (ie random up to the date of the fight), and the only problem was that Mayweather allegedly had an issue with Pacquiao training overseas, as this would mean that two drug testing associations are required to carry out the tests (as the Philippines is out of the USADA’s jurisdiction).  But provided it is still Olympic style drug testing carried out by a credible testing body, it is hard to see this being the issue holding back potentially the most lucrative boxing match of all time.

So now we wait and see.  And hope.

PS: On paper, you may argue that Pacquiao has widened the gap.  The first fight was a draw, the second a split decision and now a majority decision…

Vietnamese Pho: Thanh Ky (Taipei, Yong Kang Street)

November 12, 2011 in Food, Reviews, Taiwan, Travel

This is the original store

One of my favourite areas to eat is the lanes and alleys surrounding Taipei’s wonderful Yong Kang Street (永康街).  There is a restaurant or cafe every couple of steps, and they all look so enticing!

On this particular night, we were feeling like Vietnamese Pho (beef rice noodle soup), and from our research, Yong Kang Street has a particularly good one called Thanh Ky (誠記越南麵食館).

Thanh Ky is easy to find.  Head into Yong Kang Street from Section 2 Xin Yi Road and it’s at the corner of the third right turn.  It’s even easier to find now because they have opened a second store just across the road.  We went into the old store first but it was slightly cramped, so the staff advised that we head to the new store, which was a great idea as it was air conditioned and looking newer and cleaner.

This is the new store

I must say upfront that I have high standards for Vietnamese Pho because I had been spoiled in Sydney by all the awesome Pho places they have there.

Thanh Ky‘s menu has Chinese, English and Japanese, so it’s easy to navigate.  The signature Pho is their ‘Hanoi Beef Pho’ ($165NT), which has some special Hanoi beef, different to what I was used to back in Sydney.  They also have an assortment of other noodle soup dishes, such as Tom Yum, Satay and Curry, as well as dried noodles and vermicellis with stir fried meats.  Of course, the usual entree dishes, beef salads and rice paper rolls are also available.

We went with the Hanoi plus a mixed entree comprising some deep fried spring rolls, deep fried sugar cane prawns and deep fried fish cakes.  Fried city, but they looked scrumptious, so what the heck.

The dishes came quickly despite the restaurant being relatively busy on this rainy night.  The Hanoi came with a wedge of lemon (lime?) and some hoisin + chilli sauce, exactly like they do it in Sydney.  The bean sprouts and mint were already placed in the soup, which smelled mighty fine and fragrant.

The Hanoi Beef Pho

The Hanoi beef was thick but easy to chew, and the beef balls and tripe provide added variety.  The rice noodles were cooked to perfection — not too rubbery and not too easy to break.  But as we all know, it’s the soup base that makes or breaks a Pho.  At Thanh Ky, the soup was pretty good.  I would call it slightly on the lighter side (see in the photo the broth is quite transparent), which might appeal to some — certainly it is healthier than the translucent soups layered with fat.  That said, there are extra sauces and chilli oil on each table which you can use to strengthen the flavour.

Add to the flavour or give it an extra kick with these condiments

As for the mixed entree, no complaints.  Even though they were all deep fried, none came across as lethally oily, and together with the sauce, became actually very appetising.

Mixed entree!

To be honest, while Thanh Ky was fairly good by my lofty standards, it’s not the best Pho I’ve had in Taipei.  I’ll have to review that place soon.

7.5 out of 10!

Details:

Thanh Ky (誠記越南麵食館)

Address: No. 1 and 6, Lane 6, Yong Kang St, Taipei
Phone: (02) 2321 1579 and (02) 2322 2765
Opening Hours: 11:30am-11:30pm
Price Range: $100-$200 (depending on what you get and if you share entrees)
Website: http://www.thanhky.com/

Fight Prediction: Pacquiao-Marquez III

November 10, 2011 in Boxing, Sport

Man, time flies.

Just three days from now on the 12th of November 2011, pound-for-pound king Manny Pacquiao will take on his nemesis (no, not Floyd Mayweather Jr), Mexican warrior Juan Manuel Marquez for the third time at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas.

As most boxing aficionados know, Pacquiao and Marquez had engaged in two previous wars back in 2004 and 2008, resulting in a controversial draw (115-110, 110-115, 113-113) and a narrow, but equally controversial split decision for Pacquiao (115-112, 112-115, 114-113).  Officially, the history books currently read 1-1-0 in favour of Pacquiao, but in those who have watched the fights know that it could very well have been the other way around.

This third contest will determine once and for all who is the superior boxer, and if Pacquiao wins, pave the way for a Mayweather superfight next year (Floyd has apparently circled 5 May 2012 on his calendar as the date, but no one is holding their breath given the number of false alarms over the years).

There are several reasons why Pacquiao is the overwhelming favourite this time despite how close the first two fights were.

1. Weight

The first fight was at featherweight (126 pounds) and the second fight was at super featherweight (130 pounds).  This third fight is at a catch weight of 144 pounds.  It is well documented that Pacquiao struggled with his weight management at those lighter weights, and as we know, Pacquiao has fought around welterweight for 5 out of his last 6 bouts (Hatton being the exception at junior welterweight), and not only is he undefeated at this weight, he has demolished all those before him.  Pacquiao has grown into a fully-fledged welterweight and it appears 144 might be his optimum weight (as he had to take extra protein to get above that in other fights).

On the other hand, Marquez has been a lightweight (135 pounds) since the second Pacquiao fight and has only ventured above that once — when he fought Floyd Mayweather Jr in 2009.  In that fight, the contract weight was also a catch weight of 144 pounds (later stretched to 146 as Mayweather failed to make weight), and Marquez struggled to boost his weight up to 142 pounds, looking a little flabby around the middle on fight night.  And as we saw on that night, Marquez was not very good at this unfamiliar weight, though it could be argued that it was Mayweather’s brilliance that made him look that way.

If the videos on HBO’s 24/7 shows can be trusted, Marquez has bulked up a lot more successfully this time and has allegedly managed to preserve his speed.  This makes things more interesting, but in any case, there is no question that at 144 pounds, the cards are stacked firmly on Pacquiao’s side.

2. Age:

Boxers are getting older and older these days, and Marquez turned 38 in August.  On the other hand, Pacquiao does not turn 33 until December.  Five years is significant, but what is more concerning for Marquez is that few fighters don’t start to see significant declines past the age of 35-36.  Marquez might be the exception to the rule, as he has looked very good in almost all his recent fights, including a recent first round KO in July against Likar Ramos (who probably took a dive, but nonetheless…).

Marquez has a style that ages well, but at 32 Pacquiao is clearly in his prime, whereas Marquez may have slowed by half a step since the last time the two touched gloves.

3: Improvement:

Some people don’t believe fighters at an elite level can improve significantly, but many agree that Pacquiao is a much better fighter now than when he last fought Marquez.  Better defense, more patient, less reckless, better at following Freddie Roach’s game plans, effective punching power in both hands (instead of just the left).  And at this higher weight, he appears to be more durable, has more stamina, more power, and is arguably faster than he was before.

As for Marquez, because of his age and perhaps because he has been in Pacquiao’s shadow the last few years, not many are suggesting that he has improved much, if at all.

If we assume Pacquiao and Marquez were dead even back in 2008, it’s not surprising that most are expecting Pacquiao to walk through Marquez this time given his supposed improvement and Marquez’s supposed lack of improvement.

Prediction

There are plenty of boxing fans and experts out there who genuinely believe that Marquez won both fights.  You can judge for yourself at ESPN, which is currently showing both fights in their entirety (I and II).  You may think that, despite the 3 knockdowns in the first fight and the single knockdown in fight two, Marquez has Pacquiao’s number stylistically and won both fights, but you cannot possibly say that the fights were not close.

Fact is, even if you watch the second fight immediately after the first, you should be able to see a noticeable improvement in Pacquiao’s abilities.  That was more than 3.5 years ago.  Then watch some of his more recent fights at welterweight, and the contrast in his style and physical appearance will be astounding.

Remember, the first fight was before Pacquiao lost to Erik Morales (whom he annihilated in two subsequent rematches) and the second fight was before Pacquiao delivered beatdowns to De La Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Margarito and Mosley.  As good as Marquez is, do you see him beating any of those guys at 144 pounds?

Like most pundits, I find it difficult to believe that Marquez will have anything more than a puncher’s chance this third time.  Pacquiao proved that he is taking the fight seriously on 24/7, and his training camp is reportedly one of his best ever, with insiders saying that he has taken it to another level.  Unlike the crappy Mosley fight, Pacquiao has plenty of motivation and he has said as much.  On the other hand, Marquez remains confident because he honestly thinks he beat Pacquiao twice already — but will this confidence backfire when he realises that the person he faces on Saturday night is not the same guy he faced before (ie the guy that kept throwing right jab-left cross combos all night long)?

I see Marquez fighting valiantly and tagging Pacquiao with a few good shots, and maybe even steal few rounds here and there.  He is an extremely intelligent and crafty fighter who has shown he can figure out other fighters’ styles during a fight and historically has given Pacquiao fits.  But I also see the explosive Pacquiao hitting Marquez with a fair deal of big blows, and the added power at 144 pounds will likely lead to several knockdowns and perhaps even a cut or two.

Marquez has never been knocked out and I respect him too much to expect it to happen this time.  That is why I am predicting a wide and uncontroversial unanimous decision for Pacquiao.  It will be closer than some experts predicted and unlike the recent string of disappointing big name fights, this one will be action-packed from start to finish and a contender for fight of the year.  In the end, Pacquiao will win more rounds and coupled with the knockdowns, it will be a comfortable but hard fought victory and a fitting end to a marvellous trilogy.

Can’t wait!

Japanese Curry at Aubergine

November 9, 2011 in Food, Reviews, Taiwan, Travel

Not too far from exit 3 of Zhongxiao Fuxing MRT station is a building known as ‘Bistro 98′ (there is a massive orange ’98′ sign outside, you can’t miss it).  Inside this building are several popular restaurants and I intend to try them all.

First up, the Japanese curry/katsu joint Aubergine (not to be confused with the sensational Aubergine I visited in Canberra).  I love Japanese katsu (meat with fried crunchy bread-crumbed batter) and I love Japanese curry, so the combination was sure to arouse my interest.

Aubergine is like many Japanese chains in that they provide set meals — a main course, a salad, a soup, and a dessert and beverage.  All for a reasonable price of around NT$250-350.

On this day, we selected two sets — a pork katsu curry (‘Cordon Bleu’) with omrice (that is, rice wrapped inside an egg omelette) and a chicken curry rice (this was a simpler, more economic set).

First up came the salads and soups.  I chose the wafu (Japanese) salad dressing which is lighter, more sour and tangy, though others might prefer the creamy thousand island dressing.  As for the soups, we had an onion soup and a clam chowder.  The vegetables were fresh and crispy and the soups were flavoursome but not too heavy; good but not spectacular — exactly the kind of quality you would expect from a mid-range set-meal restaurant in Taipei.

Before the main courses were served we were treated to a plum vinegar, which is supposed to cleanse the palette.  I’m not a vinegar man but this pink concoction was surprisingly refreshing.

Then the mains.  First, the pork katsu omrice curry.  You can pick the level of spiciness of the curry and we went with the second weakest, which only has a little kick but is sweeter on the tongue.  When it arrived, the curry was thick and authentic and I lapped it up with the fat Japanese  rice inside the thin egg omelette.  Mmm…

However, I did not expect the rice to be a kind of fried rice in that it contained bits of ham.  This is significant because the Cordon Bleu katsu also contained a layer of ham and a layer of cheese underneath the batter.  The extra goodies beneath the batter was what enticed me to order it, but when combined with the heavy curry and the chunks of ham with the rice, it became a little too much.  Not to say it wasn’t tasty but it was the kind of dish that could make you feeling full in a hurry.

The other main, the chicken curry, had a similar curry but was not as heavy as it contained carrots and radishes and the chicken was not deep fried.  Unfortunately, the chicken thigh fillets were not particularly tender, though I must admit the curry was so nice that it didn’t make a huge difference to me (personally).

I was stuffed after the mains, but as I like to say, there’s always room for dessert.  I had a hot black tea and the dessert was a simple milk custard that was way better than I could have expected.

Overall, Aubergine was solid but nothing special.  The soup, salad, katsu, and omrice were all fairly good for the price, and I personally rather enjoyed the flavour of their curry.  Not a bad place for a casual meal.

7 out of 10

Details:

Website: http://aubergine.com.tw

 

Branches:

Zhongxiao East Road (Bistro 98):

Address: Level 3, No. 98, Zhong Xiao E Road, Sec. 4
Closest MRT: Zhongxiao Fuxing, Exit 3
Phone: 02-6638-6889
Opening Hours:  11:30-21:00

Gongguan:

Address: Level 2, No. 85, Roosevelt Road, Sec. 4
Closest MRT: Gongguan, Exit 2
Phone: 02-2366-1258
Opening Hours:  11:30-21:00

Neihu:

Address: Level 1, No. 37, Lane 513, Ruiguang Road
Closest MRT: Xihu, Exit 2
Phone: 02-2659-7809
Opening Hours:  Mon-Fri 11:30 – 14:30 / 17:00 – 21:00; Sat-Sun 11:30 – 21:00

Bad Behavior has blocked 347 access attempts in the last 7 days.