You are browsing the archive for 2011 January.

Movie Review: Little Fockers (2010)

January 10, 2011 in Movie Reviews

Meet the Parents (released in 2000) is one of my favourite comedies.  The 2004 sequel, Meet the Fockers, was silly and disappointing, despite the added star power Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand.  And so I was a little wary of the third film, Little Fockers. Any time a franchise reaches its third standalone film (ie not a planned trilogy), there’s a risk that the jokes will start wearing thin.

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened here.  Even with the whole gang back (Robert De Niro, Ben Stiller, Tero Polo, Blythe Danner, Owen Wilson, Hoffman and Streisand) plus a surprisingly good Jessica Alba inserted (along with Harvey Keitel and Laura Dern), Little Fockers failed to capture the essence of what made the first film so good.

This one, as the title suggests, takes place several years after the second film, with Greg Focker (Stiller) and his wife Pam (Polo) raising twins, who are about to celebrate their birthdays.  Of course, Greg’s father-in-law and former CIA agent Jack (De Niro) is still around making Greg’s life hell, and the majority of the movie revolves around several subplots — Greg representing an erectile dysfunction drug (which is where Alba comes in), getting his place ready for the birthday party (enter Keitel) and the trying to get his kids into a prestigious kintergarten (enter Dern).

I won’t deny that there were some good moments and funny one liners, especially with Wilson, Alba and Dern, but on the whole there were too many stale, lame jokes.  The cleverness and the subtlety of the original have been thrown out the window in favour of unoriginal cheap laughs and sex gags, especially towards the end.

While Little Fockers is definitely a level or two better than the disaster that was Meet the Fockers, it nevertheless continues to damage the goodwill of the original.

2.5 stars out of 5

Movie Review: The Tourist (2010)

January 9, 2011 in Movie Reviews

Two of the biggest and sexiest stars in the world (Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie) teaming up with the director that brought us the Oscar-winning The Lives of Others — sounded like a winning formula to me.

Unfortunately, and inexplicably, The Tourist turned out to be a somewhat stale and poorly paced action thriller that wasted all the incredible talent involved.

As the title suggests, Depp is Frank, a tourist who by chance meets a woman named Elise (Jolie), who turns out to be a secret agent that turns his life upside down.  There are gangsters and British government officials (led by criminally underused Paul Bettany), and there’s the usual chase scenes, mixed in with a touch of romance and a couple of twists, but it all felt strangely flat and uneventful (despite the beautiful backdrop of Venice).

Both Depp and Jolie produced sub-par performances by their usually lofty standards, but perhaps the biggest problem was their lack of chemistry.  I really don’t know why, but they had such little spark that the romance, which drives the narrative, never felt believable.

At the end of the day, The Tourist was an average film (at most) that should have been much much better.  Just shows you can’t toss up a couple of stars and a hot director and expect brilliant results.

2.5 stars out of 5

DOZO: Japanese Fusion Izakaya in Tapiei

January 8, 2011 in Food, Taiwan, Travel

Restaurant: DOZO Izakaya Dining Bar
Cuisine: Japanese Fusion Izakaya
Location: No. 102 GuangFu South Road, Da-An District, Taipei, Taiwan (take Exit 5 from the Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hall MRT Station)
Phone: +886 2 2778 1134
Email: service@dozo.com.tw
Website: http://www.dozoizakaya.com
Price: Approximately NT600-1000 per person excluding drinks

I love Japanese food, so when I found out about Dozo, a popular ‘classy’ izakaya joint (they serve small servings of a large variety of food with alcohol) in Taipei, I decided I must go.

I remember it was raining that night, and we wandered right past the place a couple of times — not because it was small — quite the contrary — Dozo is huge, but it’s also dark and has an inconspicuous glass entrance that‘s hard to spot.

Inside, Dozo is extremely spacious and artistically decorated, filled dark funiture spliced with patches of bright red.  It has two floors and a long bar against the wall.  Dimly lit with moving lights that flash ‘Dozo’ all over the place.  Oozes classiness but probably also a costly bill (by Taiwanese standards).

Anyway, we got a seat without a reservation and were amazed by the variety they had — in both food and drinks.  Much of it was non-traditional fusion Japanese that included touches of Korean and Western flavours.  Very interesting mix.  The drinks in particular looked amazing.

I took photos of most of the dishes we got (unless we dug in before remembering) — though it was with a phone camera and in poorly lit conditions, so I apologise for the poor quality.

 

Slice Octopus with Kimchi and Mayo

Grilled Eel Rice

Salmon and Avacado Sushi

Skewer Platter

The Ham and Cheese Chicken Katsu

You can check out Dozo‘s entire food and drinks menu at their cool website here.

The food was, I must admit, not as good as it looked or sounded.  Pretty good, but not outstanding, though that might be because I’ve been to some terrific Izakayas in Japan.  It’s the type of place that you go for the ambience and atmosphere, and best visited with a group of people, so you can try as many of their dishes as you can.

7.5 out of 10

Start of Year DVD Blitz: Part I

January 6, 2011 in Movie Reviews

As promised, here is my first set of DVD reviews for the start of 2011!

Centurion (2010)

Here’s another one that when I first saw the trailer thought was going to be a hit — but strangely, it either never screened or screened for such a short time that nobody noticed, then went straight to DVD.

Centurion is based on the Roman conquest of the Picts, told from the perspective of the ill-fated Ninth Legion.  It’s dark, moody, gritty, extremely violent and gory, and a surprisingly enjoyable ride.  Even though we get the story from the side of the Romans, there are really no good guys or villains in this one.  

Excellent performances from a great cast, including Michael Fassbender, Olga Kurylenko and Dominic West, even though the script and characters probably don’t do the performances justice.

Centurion certainly doesn’t have the depth or wide appeal of Gladiator, but hardcore battle fans (like myself) might get a kick out of it because it does have some wonderful battle and fight scenes.

3.5 stars out of 5

Cop Out (2010)

This buddy cop comedy starring Bruce Willis and Tracy Morgan (from 30 Rock) and directed by Kevin Smith has been on many of the ‘Worst Film of the Year’ lists, so I decided to check it out for myself.

And well…I didn’t personally hate the film, but it was pretty awful, especially when you factor in the director (Smith has been a favourite of mine, even though this is the first time he didn’t direct his own material) and the all-star cast (which also includes Rashida Jones, Jason Lee, Sean William Scott, Adam Brody and Kevin Pollack).

My problem with Cop Out was that it wasn’t as funny or clever as it thought it was.  I haven’t seen much of 30 Rock, but Tracy Morgan was extremely annoying.  He just wouldn’t stop shouting and screaming all the time.  It was exhausting to watch and listen to him go on like a lunatic for the overlong 107-minute running time.

There were a couple of amusing scenes but most of it was pretty stock standard stuff that you’d see in any B-grade comedy.

1.75 stars out of 5

Remember Me (2010)

Enter the non-Twilight star vehicle for Rob Patz to showcase his acting chops as Tyler Hawkins, an American college student who has a dead brother, a neglected younger sister and a father (Pierce Brosnan) who is too absorbed in his work to care.  He meets and befriends Ally Craig (Emilie de Ravin), a girl with a dead mother and an overprotective cop father.  Sad, tragic, melodramatic love story.

Remember Me is depressing and tries too hard to tug at the heart strings through numerous ‘please feel sorry for me’ sequences.  At its core it’s not a horrible film, but there’s not a whole lot going for it.  It had a strong introductory sequence but went downhill from there, and even though I expected things to pick up and the various plot threads to be tied together, it never really happened.

The ending, which I’m sure gets discussed a lot, came out of nowhere, and I believe some might even find it offensive to pull a stunt like that.

Watchable for Rob Patz fans, but everyone else won’t be missing much by skipping this one.

2 stars out of 5

Knight and Day (2010)

Knight and Day is acomedy action film about an ordinary girl caught up in the world of CIA operatives and dangerous/revolutionary inventions.  It’s fast paced, outrageous, over-the-top, and quite fun if you don’t take it seriously.

However, I didn’t really like it much.  To be honest, it’s probably because the film stars Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz.  I used to really like Cruise, but ever since he lost the plot there’s just something off about him, even on screen.  Maybe he’s getting too old, but the suave routine he got used to pulling on Top Gun and Mission: Impossible doesn’t work for me anymore.  As for Diaz, sorry if this offends anyone, but I really dislike her face.  I know she’s considered one of the most attractive women in the world, but I simply don’t get it.  It became a distraction to the detriment of the viewing experience.

Knight and Day is a film that runs on the charm and chemistry of the two main characters, so fans of Cruise/Diaz might enjoy it a lot more than I did.  But unfortunately for me, I let my prejudices get the better of my objective judgment.

2.5 stars out of 5

Me and Orson Welles (2009)

A coming-of-age/character study film by Richard Linklater about a 17-year-old kid (Zac Efron) who got to spend a few months with Orson Welles (Christian McKay), the man credited with making Citizen Kane, a film widely regarded as the best of all time.  However, this film takes place in 1937 (4 years before Citizen Kane), and it was about a stage production of Julius Caesar.

It’s pretty light-hearted, harmless stuff, but to me, it was more like ‘Meh’ and Orson Welles.  Perhaps lovers of period pieces and those who appreciate meticulously designed sets and the threatre might enjoy it more than I did.  I don’t deny that the film is well-made, though I can’t help it if it didn’t get my juices flowing.

Efron is adequate and McKay is actually brilliant as Welles, the egotistical, narcissistic genius, but neither the technical attributes nor the performances made me enjoy this film as much as I wanted to.

3 stars out of 5

I still have a few more left — Part II should be coming soon.

Gift Cards are so pointless!

January 5, 2011 in Blogging, Social/Political Commentary

I was just down at the post office to pick up a package that had been sitting there for a couple of weeks (thanks to the flawless efficiency of Australia Post) and noticed the incredible variety of gift cards on display.

Really, it was crazy.  According to the Australia Post website, there are over 40 brands of ‘high profile gift cards’ ranging from Country Road to Angus & Robertson to Event Cinemas to iTunes to freaking AMF Bowling, and range in value from $20 to $200.

I have received and given gift cards before, as much as I am ashamed to admit, but seriously, what is the point of them?  If you are going to be lazy enough to not pick out a specific gift for someone, why not just give them cash?

There are a host of reasons why a company might want to offer gift cards for their stores, products and services (and these are listed at the Australia Post website here), but why would anyone want to give or receive a gift card when a much better alternative (ie cash) is available?

A specific gift means you actually put some thought into what that person wants or you think they might want.  It also has the advantage of disguising how much you spent on them (provided you remembered to remove the price tag).

Contrast that to the mighty gift card.  First off, it shows you didn’t put much thought into the gift, if any.  I don’t care so I’ll just give them a gift card for somewhere and they can go buy something there.  Secondly, it tells the receiver exactly how much you spent on them, to the cent.  There’s no more passing off a $100 gift you spent $30 on (because you got it on sale).

But the most illogical thing about gift cards is that they are awfully presumptuous of the giver because they assume that the receiver would actually want to purchase something from a particular store.  Or perhaps, they think the receiver should get something from a particular store, or watch a movie, or go bowling, or read a book, or buy a song.  It locks them in.  Forces them to spend money on something they might not really want.

Which begs the question — why not just give cash?  Let’s face it — given the same value, we would all rather have cash than a stupid gift card.  It’s exactly like a gift card, except you can spend it wherever you want, whenever you want, or you don’t have to spend it at all!  It’s also less presumptuous, and unlike gift cards, you can actually get change back when you purchase something less than the full value (rather than a silly voucher for next time).

Think about it.  Are gift cards really that much less impersonal than cash?  Does the fact that you went down to the post office (or store) and thought about which card to get offset the obvious disadvantages of a gift card?  Have we all been duped by this now massive industry that is in fact completely pointless?

Bad Behavior has blocked 585 access attempts in the last 7 days.