You are browsing the archive for 2010 September.

Movie Review: Tomorrow, When the War Began (2010)

September 14, 2010 in Movie Reviews

To be honest, I had never heard of the bestselling Tomorrow series (total of 7 bookss) by John Marsden until the film of the first book, Tomorrow, When the War Began, started making waves in the headlines.  I was intrigued by the teaser poster, which has a girl with her back turned, looking out into the vast, empty plains.  It gave me the feeling that this was going to be a promising blockbuster, and I was utterly shocked when I discovered that it was Australian.

Anyway, I went and checked it out over the weekend, harbouring some moderate expectations.  And I am glad to say, at a basic level, the film delivered — an intriguing story, teenage angst, and a fair amount of action.  While it was clearly not at the level of most Hollywood blockbusters, with a budget of just $20 million, I think Tomorrow, When the War Began was a solid domestic effort.

For those who aren’t familiar with the story, it’s about a bunch of teenagers from a small Australian country town that decide to go camping, and while they are away, Australia is invaded by an unknown foreign enemy.  How will they respond?  Will they hide, or will they fight back?  (I think we all know the answer).

The film is written and directed by Stuart Beattie, who worked on 30 Days of Night, GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra, Australia and Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. As Marsden’s book was first published in 1993, several changes were required to make this a ‘modern’ adaptation.  I haven’t read the book yet (recently bought a copy), but from what I have heard the film is quite faithful to the original source.

What I enjoyed about the movie was that it was, for the most part, pretty entertaining.  There’s nothing like a story about a bunch of average youngsters of various backgrounds and personalities who find themselves tossed into a perilous situation and must band together to overcome their prejudices and weaknesses in order to give themselves a chance to become heroes.  We’ve seen it done before plenty of times, but for me, it never gets old, as long as it is well executed.

Yes, most of the stuff that happens in the film beggars belief, but it didn’t bother me at all.  I accepted the gaps in logic and just went along for the ride.  Even though there were very few surprises throughout the film, I still found many sequences to be tense and exciting.

And of course, we’ve got quite a cast of stereotypical characters — the strong, independent protagonist Ellie (Caitlin Stasey), the naive but loyal best friend Corrie (Rachel Hurd-Wood), the local bad boy Homer (Deniz Akdeniz) the wimpy jock Kevin (Lincoln Lewis), the dumb blonde Fi (Phoebe Tonkin), the token hardworking Asian Lee (Chris Pang), the token religious freak Robyn (Ashleigh Cummings), and the token stoner Chris (Andy Ryan).

I didn’t have a big problem with the characters themselves, but it pains me to say that the acting from the young cast was somewhat uneven.  Without naming names, I will simply say that some of the acting was cringeworthy (though the majority of it was passable).  Again, I can’t discuss the book as I haven’t read it yet, but I would put some of the blame on the dialogue.  Corny?  Yes.  Realistic?  Not even close.  The interactions between some of the characters also felt strained and unnatural.  I could see what they were aiming for but they couldn’t quite pull it off.

So that was my impression of Tomorrow, When the War Began.  A solid Aussie action flick (gosh there are so few of them), but ultimately nothing special.  Nevertheless, the film has been doing very well across Australia and New Zealand, which means sequels could be forthcoming.  If so, let’s hope they can turn it up another notch.

3.5 stars out of 5

(A couple of nice touches in the film were the little jokes about the book and the subtle references to Australia’s invasive past)

Movie Review: Forbidden Lie$ (2007)

September 10, 2010 in Movie Reviews

I came across Forbidden Lie$, the phenomenal 2007 Australian documentary (directed by Anna Broinowski), while researching for an interview.  While perhaps not one of the best made documentaries from a technical standpoint, Forbidden Lie$ is definitely one of the most intriguing and exciting films I’ve seen this year.

Some may recall the worldwide bestselling book Forbidden Love (also known as Honor Lost in the United States), written by Norma Khouri.  Released in the aftermath of September 11, Forbidden Love tells the purportedly true story of a Jordanian woman (Khouri’s best friend) who was stabbed to death by her family in an “honour killing” simply because she was in a chaste relationship with a non-Muslim man.

The book brought the insanity of these honour killings to the Western world, and for a while, Khouri was a huge star, appearing at book festivals and on TV shows all around the world, discussing the subject like an advocate and expert.  She was pretty, charismatic, passionate, and yet completely inexperienced in love.  People lined up for hours just to shake her hand and book signings and people even wrote songs about her.  Forbidden Lie$ was ranked by Australians as one of their 100 favourite books of all time, and it was said to have sold over 500,000 copies around the world.

That’s certainly the way Forbidden Lie$ starts out, painting Khouri as a remarkable woman who fled from oppression to tell her amazing true story to the world.  But for those who know the story, things suddenly take a crazy turn.  I won’t go into it much more than that, but the title of the film says it all.

Proving that truth is stranger than fiction, the film unravels like a well-written mystery — is she telling the truth, just part of the truth, or is everything that comes out of her mouth a bold-faced lie (like George Costanza trying to lie his way out of more lies at all costs)?

Part of the reason the film progresses like this is because director Anna Broinowski approached Khouri with the intention of making a film that would tell her side of the story and exonerate her from all the allegations.  So in many ways, the film is really Broinowski’s journey as she goes from stern believer to unconvinced sceptic.  Just how far will Khouri go to prove her innocence?

There are plenty of unexpected twists and turns, as more and more secrets start coming out of the woodwork, and yet, as Khouri is often the voice we hear, we feel almost compelled to believe everything she says.

The final half-hour or so may be too long-winded and repetitive, and some of the tactics were a little cheesy, but on the whole Forbidden Lie$ is simply riveting.  I can’t believe I hadn’t heard about the documentary until only a couple of days ago.

4 stars out of 5

Good news for those who now want to see it: the entire film is available on YouTube in 10 parts.  Check it out yourself.  Here is the trailer.

And if you want to read more about the story (warning: contains spoilers), I would recommend this article from journalist David Leser, who also appears in the film — Norma Khouri: The Inside Story of a Disgraced Author

NBA 2K11 or NBA Elite 2011?

September 8, 2010 in Basketball, Boxing, Game Reviews, NBA

[Update: To read my thoughts on the NBA 2K11 demo (with a few thoughts on Elite thrown in), click here, and to read about my thoughts on the NBA Elite 2011 demo (with a few thoughts on 2K thrown in), click here]

Still early days…well, not really.  We’re about a month away from the release of the games (5 October 2010), and so far there has been surprisingly little information released on both NBA 2K11 and NBA Elite 2011 (formerly the ‘Live’ franchise).

We know NBA 2K11 is bringing back Michael Jordan (personally not that excited about it but I know a lot of fanboys are spraying their baggy shorts) and a bunch of legendary teams from the past.  We know they still have essentially the same control system plus a slightly revamped My Player Mode (with press conferences where you can choose how you want to answer questions — not sure about how good of an idea this is — if there isn’t enough variety it could get old in a hurry).  Apart from that, the game looks and feels very much like NBA 2K10, which was excellent and in my opinion better than NBA Live 2010.

As for NBA Elite 2011, everything is changing.  Apparently they are revamping the game from the ground up, and the biggest thing they’ve got is the new hands-0n controls that allow you do control every move on the court.  It’s also got, supposedly, real-life physics, ‘real’ AI (are they suggesting all the AI before was fake?) and some new ‘Be a Pro’ mode, which is a subtle rip-off of My Player, but involves you trying to become ‘Legendary’ (I suppose like Fight Night Round 4).  And the big bonus — it will allow access to three modes of the long-awaited return of one of the greatest basketball games ever, NBA Jam!

Looking at the visuals, the fluidity and sheer awesomeness of the moves, I’d probably still say 2K has the edge at the moment, though Elite does intrigue me with its new control system.  If 2K thinks it can just throw in Michael Jordan and basically keep everything else the same (we haven’t really heard of any actual gameplay improvements), then they might be in trouble this year — or at least they ought to be.  I like the fact that these two franchises are competing and keeping each other in check.

I’m not going to post the trailers because NBA Elite 2011 hasn’t posted a proper one yet, and the stuff that’s out there at the moment makes the game look pretty awful in comparison to NBA 2k11, which I don’t believe is fair.

HOWEVER, when looking for some gameplay photos I found this beauty from the EA Sports website (they make NBA Elite).  Well, I think the caption just about says it all…these EA guys clearly have no idea what they are doing when it comes to basketball…

For those who can't see the caption it says: 'Kevin Durant sets up for a three pointer'...well done EA!

We’re in real trouble.

Hunter Valley Dining: Amanda’s on the Edge

September 8, 2010 in Food

The view from Amanda's

Lunch on our second day at the Hunter Valley was another difficult choice.  Ultimately, we went with the nearby ‘Amanda’s on the Edge’, one of the highest rated restaurants in the region according to a number of websites.

Amanda’s (as I like to call it), is one of those small cottage-like restaurants with a family feel to it.  The photos on the website have been done very well because to be honest the real thing didn’t look nearly as nice.  Not to say it wasn’t a classy establishment.  It just wasn’t anything outstanding.

One of the reasons we chose Amanda’s was because of a deal we saw in the local ‘Dining Out’ magazine — a daily lunch special for $30, which includes wine, bread and salad.

However, as it turned out, you could only pick an entrée to go with your beverage, bread and salad, as opposed to a main course.  It was slightly misleading because that means for $30 you might not really get a very full meal as the entrées are quite small.  That said, we weren’t looking to stuff ourselves, and they did allow us to exchange one of the salads for shoestring fries.

We went with the special anyway, and selected the seared scallops (ordinarily $20.50) and the lobster and crab bisque (ordinarily $19.50), together with a Caesar salad and shoestring fries.  We also ordered a dessert separately.

Crab and Lobster Bisque

Scallops

The sides: Caesar salad and shoestring fries

Dessert!

Truth be told, the food was good but not sensational.  There were only four scallops, and they were somewhat overcooked in I suppose a Chinese-style with soy sauce and spring onions.  I’ve had better scallops at proper Chinese restaurants.  As for the bisque, I quite liked it, even though the it was a little on the salty side.  The dessert, a big mix of fruity stuff, was just okay.  Surprisingly, the highlights were probably the salad and the fries, which were excellent by side-order standards.

For the price and the reputation, I had expected more from Amanda’s.  The staff and the ambience were pleasant (I think it would be a particularly wonderful place for a larger group of people looking to relax on a lazy afternoon), but the food has room for improvement.

6.5 out of 10

Book Review: The Journalist and the Murderer by Janet Malcolm

September 6, 2010 in Book Reviews

Janet Malcolm’s famous intro to The Journalist and the Murderer goes like this:

Every journalist who is not too stupid or too full of himself to notice what is going on knows that what he does is morally indefensible.  He is a kind of confidence man, preying on people’s vanity, ignorance, or loneliness, gaining their trust and betraying them without remorse.

And that’s just the first few lines of her short book, originally published in 1990.

The Journalist and the Murderer tells the story of Dr Jeffrey MacDonald, a philandering, narcissistic man accused of killing his wife and two young daughters on 17 February 1970.  In June 1979, a couple of months before he was convicted, MacDonald commissioned journalist Joe McGinnis to write a book about him, hoping that the book will convince the world of his innocence.  The two struck a deal to split the profits, and McGinnis was entitled to write whatever he wanted, “provided the essential integrity” of MacDonald’s life story is maintained.

And so McGinnis officially became a member of MacDonald’s trial team and the two became extremely close friends, or so it appeared on the surface.  McGinnis had access to all of MacDonald’s materials.  In addition, MacDonald sent McGinnis tapes of recorded material, and the two frequently traded letters.  MacDonald believed his buddy was going to write a book that will help exonerate him.

Instead, when Fatal Vision was published in 1983, McGinnis painted MacDonald as a cold, remorseless psychopath that, in his opinion, undoubtedly massacred his family in a drug-fuelled rage.  MacDonald, devastated and angry (though still serving his sentence), commenced proceedings against McGinnis for fraud.  Amazingly, although the trial ended with a hung jury, five of the six jurors had sided with MacDonald, the convicted killer.  Eventually, the two settled out of court for $325,000.

Damn, I just told you the whole story, didn’t I?  Don’t worry, it actually helps to know the story when reading this book, which goes far deeper than just the story on the surface.

The Journalist and the Murderer is a fascinating book, the type of non-fiction that sucks you in and can be finished off in one afternoon sitting.  Having just started doing some journalistic work for my writing course, I found the themes to be particularly gripping — is it okay for a journalist to lie, or lead their subject on, just so they could gather the “truth”?  Is there a line that should not be crossed?  And did Joe McGinnis cross that line?

The book has compiled a number of key interviews with those close to the MacDonald-McGinnis trial, and it was remarkable to see the different stances that the two sides took, especially on the question of whether they thought MacDonald was in fact guilty of the crimes he was convicted for.

The book also contained various letters exchanged between MacDonald and McGinnis that really demonstrates the level of deceit that was occuring, and that MacDonald had absolutely no idea what was coming.

Of course, the fact that Janet Malcolm is also writing this critic of journalism as a journalist adds an additional layer of contemplation and complexity to this book.  In savaging McGinnis of his methods in gathering information, she is only too aware of the methods she is employing herself to get the most out of her subjects.  And one thing I didn’t know was that Malcolm herself was sued for libel by the main character of one of her books, In the Freud Archives.

I liked Malcolm’s style.  It’s bold and it’s cutting, but there’s also a sense of self-awareness to it.  You don’t have to like it to appreciate it.

Terrific read.

4 out of 5

[PS: this was another one of those books where I read the first few pages for my writing course but found it so interesting that I got the whole thing.]

Bad Behavior has blocked 585 access attempts in the last 7 days.