You are browsing the archive for 2009 October.

Inside Agassi and Becker’s secret rivalry

October 31, 2009 in Best Of, Entertainment, Tennis

agassi admission

Few people know the real reason behind Agassi's drug revelations

[For my new post on the Agassi-Chang rivalry, click here]

By now everyone should know about Andre Agassi’s explosive admission that he used crystal meth (the dangerous drug otherwise known as ‘ice’) in 1997, tested positive, then got away with it by writing a simple explanation letter to the ATP.  However, very few people know about the underlying reason for this seemingly pointless admission – Agassi’s ongoing contest with Boris Becker to see who can dominate the tennis spotlight.

What? I hear you say.  Allow me to explain.

All one has to do is to take a look at the careers and post-career lives of these two great tennis champions.

First set

Boris Becker played 15 years of professional tennis, was number 1 in the world and claimed 6 grand slam titles.  Andre Agassi, on the other hand, stuck around for 20 years, was also number 1 in the world at some stage, and bagged 8 grand slam titles, including the rare career grand slam.  Strictly speaking, Agassi has probably had a slightly more impressive career based on titles alone.  Further, Agassi has a 10-4 record against Becker, including a 4-1 record in grand slam matches.  The first set goes to Agassi, 6-4.

Second set

However, the real battle between these two warriors took place outside the tennis courts.  Both men craved the spotlight, and it was only a matter of time before they started trying to outdo each other.

Boris Becker, with his attacking style, struck first, marrying famous photographer Barbara Feltus in 1993 by first getting her pregnant.  The couple also caused shockwaves when they posed nude together in a photo taken by Babara’s father before the wedding.  Becker had captured the spotlight of the tennis world off the court, and for a while, there was no one to challenge him.

Enter Andre Agassi, who either intentionally or inadvertently stole the spotlight from Becker with a high profile celebrity wedding of his own.  Agassi, the natural baseliner known for his defensive brilliance, took his time, dating actress Brooke Shields from 1993 (perhaps already with Becker in mind) and wedding her in 1997.  It was a stormy relationship that the media feasted on, snatching away the attention so dearly craved by Becker.  Easy second set for Agassi, 6-2.

andre-agassi-usa_06

Andre Agassi

Third set

Frustrated, Becker planned his next move, only to be caught off-guard by a pre-emptive strike from Agassi, who rocked the tennis world again by ending his marriage with Brooke Shields in April 1999.  Not to be outdone, a furious Becker initiated a separation from his own wife in December of the same year.  To kick it up a notch, there was the whole debacle surrounding the pre-nup the couple signed, which brought more media scrutiny than even Becker had hoped for.  Thanks to the messy divorce settlement, Becker finally edged Agassi this time in a tie-break, 7-6 (11-9).

Fourth set

From here, both tennis greats stepped up their games and took the rivalry to a new level.  First Agassi began dating one of the greatest female tennis players of all time, Steffi Graf, after the French Open champion’s ball in 1999.  Two of the greatest of all time dating?  It was a strange doubles combination, that’s for sure, but think about the kids they’d have!

But Becker brought his A-game this time and dropped a bombshell on Agassi and the tennis world by revealing that he had impregnated a waitress in the broom closet of Nobu in London after his last match in 1999 (following Wimbledon).  Just to milk it a bit more, Becker initially denied paternity, claiming that he was an ‘unseeded’ player, until a DNA test confirmed what he had known all along.

Nevertheless, the impact was undeniable.  Becker was king of the headlines once more, and as a result people barely flinched when Agassi and Graf married in 2001.  A big comeback for Becker, 6-1 in the fourth set!

becker

Boris Becker

Final set

From here, with the match tied 2 sets apiece (6-4, 6-2, 6-7, 1-6), the two men were exhausted and struggled to come up with new material.  Agassi and Graf started pumping out kids and made a few headlines when they played doubles together.  Becker, on the other hand, went through a custody battle and another broken engagement through which he was dumped by text message.  It was all very tame and both men were having difficulty coping without controversy.

Becker even tried to relive some of his best moments when he recently (a week before Agassi’s latest revelations) declared that the daughter he had with the waitress was actually conceived on an uncomfortable set of stairs as opposed to a broom closet.  Regardless, he admitted in shame that it was the quickest match he had ever played, prompting suggestions that there were other reasons apart from his powerful serve that earned him the nickname ‘Boom Boom’.  Indeed, the waitress recently likened Becker to a “runaway train” in her new tell-all book In One Breath (named after the length of the encounter).

Just when the two champions appeared to be heading down an endless fifth set with each unable to break the serve of the other, Agassi stunned the world with his latest drug revelations.  One of the greatest tennis players of all time not only took ice, but he had also gotten away with it!  Let’s not forget, 5 of Agassi’s 8 grand slams were won after 1997 – if he had been banned from tennis the way he should have, then Becker probably would have won their secret contest already.

The disappointment in Becker was apparent for all to witness in his latest interview, where he said: ”I’m the last person to throw stones, as there have been some difficult times in my own life (emphasis added), but to hear that he took crystal meth, that certainly puts a whole new light on Andre.  And it’s not a beautiful light.”

”There have been stories over the years about some tennis players taking drugs, but maybe they were just stories, and now Andre, a big star, has been so open about what he took and how he lied to avoid punishment. I’m struggling to think of anything else in tennis that comes close to this.”  At this point, Boris whipped out some old newspaper clippings of his Nobu scandal, but no one seemed to notice.

”Andre didn’t just take drugs, he also tested positive for drugs and then got away with it, and that’s not good at all for tennis, especially for the governing bodies,” Becker said. ”People are going to be thinking, ‘How could this happen?  How could he get away with this?’”

Clearly, the fact that Agassi ‘got away with it’ has plagued Becker, who added: “If it had been made public in 1997 that Andre was using drugs, his career, and his life, would have been very different.  He wouldn’t be where he is today.  Maybe his career would not have survived if everyone knew that he had taken drugs, and if he was banned from the tour for a while.  But no one knew until now, and it was after he took crystal meth that he played some of the best tennis of his life.  He won many grand slams after that.”

For the last person to throw stones, that’s certainly a lot of rocks!

Perhaps sensing that defeat was inevitable, Becker threw in a futile last-ditch effort, reminding everyone that in his own memoir, he admitted to washing down sleeping pills with whisky.  I’m sure he wanted to say: “That’s almost as bad as ice!”  Unfortunately, victory had already slipped out of his grasp.

Game.  Set.  Match.

Agassi defeats Becker, 6-4, 6-2, 6-7 (11-9), 1-6, 27-25, in their secret contest.

Movie Review: Saw VI (2009)

October 31, 2009 in Movie Reviews

Saw6_003

After seeing how confused and convoluted the Saw franchise had gotten after the lacklustre effort that was Saw V, I didn’t think it was possible for them squeeze another one.  Clearly, I underestimated the writers, who not only managed to pump out another 91 minutes of torture porn and link it to the rest of the series, but also made it surprisingly good.  Well, relatively speaking anyway.

Saw VI picks up where the last one took off, and like most film franchises that have lasted this long, assume some level of prior knowledge.  There are some flashbacks, but for the most part you’re left to rely on your memory to recall what the heck happened in the last two or three films.  And if your memory is anything like mine, you’re likely going to be struggling to make the ‘jigsaw’ pieces fit.

Thankfully, Saw VI has a plot of its own, so it doesn’t really matter if the central storyline running through the franchise doesn’t click.  Needless to say, there’s the mysterious, torturous ‘game’ with a number of unwilling (albeit deserving) participants caught up in a series of moral dilemmas, ingenious but gruesome contraptions, the obligatory plot twist, and of course, copious amounts of blood and guts.

That said, while the whole affair was rather predictable, Saw VI somehow managed to stay afloat.  It would have been very easy for the film to have crashed and burned, but first-time director Kevin Greutert and regular Saw franchise writers Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan made the film much more intelligent and suspenseful than one would have expected.  However, that doesn’t change the fact that you still know what to expect, and that’s what ultimately prevents Saw VI from being anything more than an above average episode of a declining franchise.

So, where does that leave my review of the movie?  At the end of the day, Saw VI was more of the same old stuff we’ve been seeing since the very first one back in 2004.  If you’ve seen the others in the series, you’ll likely be numb by now and the film just won’t have the same impact.  On the other hand, if this is your first of the franchise, you won’t have a clue about the elaborate back story.  Either way, it’s neither particularly good nor particularly bad.

2.5 out of 5 stars!

[PS: judging from the ending, I suppose we can expect a Saw VII next year...]

Game Review: NBA 2K10

October 31, 2009 in Basketball, Game Reviews, NBA

2k10cover

I don’t think I have ever rushed out to buy a video game on the day of its release like I would for a movie or a book, but I did in the case of 2K Sports’ latest offering in basketball, NBA 2K10 (on PS3).

It was a difficult decision to make, especially since NBA Live 2010 has made a valiant attempt to steal back the title of ‘best NBA sim’ from 2K this year.  For those who are having trouble deciding between the two, check out this post here.

Visuals (9/10)

Now I would just like to preface this by saying that the last NBA game I played properly was on the PS2, so needless to say, the graphics on the PS3 blew my mind.  If you have poor eyesight and/or you are old, it’s easy to confuse the graphics for an actual basketball game.  You wouldn’t be the first.

Visually, NBA 2K10 is a treat.  Every person on screen is constantly moving, and I don’t just mean the players on the court.  The bench players, the coaches, the referees, the cheerleaders, the mascots, the photographers, the crowd.  And they’re not just there to look at because you can interact with them.  You may take a difficult shot and fall into the floor sweeper, or you may dance along the sideline running back on defense and tumble into the bench.

2k10screen2

The player animations are also stunning.  Almost every notable player style in the NBA (and outside the NBA) has been captured.  You can tell how extensive the research and motion-capturing has been just by creating your own player, because for each movement – whether it is a jump shot, free throw, fadeaway, leaner or dribble move – there are dozens of options to choose from.  Passing, screening, rebounding, boxing out – just about anything you can do on the real basketball court can be done in NBA 2K10 – except it looks better in the game.

That said, the visuals are not perfect.  While the animations themselves are smooth, the switch from one animation to another is sometimes a little choppy.  For instance, if you are trying to move your player and execute a series of cross-over moves at the same time, the player might start doing some awkward jerking movements.  Likewise, when a referee tries to fetch the ball, they might run, walk and turn in weird robotic movements.  Further, the crowd can also look like a bunch of square-headed mannequins.  And when you look closely at some of the close up shots of the players, the fingers might look a little squarish, or the jersey might go straight through part of the player’s arm, or the hands might not be firmly attached to the ball.  Nitpicking, I know, but it shows there’s still plenty of room for improvement.

Compared to NBA Live 2010, 2K10 holds its own very well.  I think it’s a matter of personal preference.  Some people think NBA Live players look too skinny, while others thing 2K players look too squarish.  Personally, I think the Live 2010 players are too shiny, but the 2K10 players sometimes don’t look like they sweat enough.  The Live 2010 faces probably make the players look better but the 2K10 faces look more realistic.  One thing I will say though is that the colours in Live 2010 look and feel a lot more vibrant.

Sound (9/10)

The NBA 2K10 commentary is second to none.  The team comprises Kevin Harlan, Clark Kellogg and Cheryl Miller, and it’s a solid trio.  The banter is interactive and responsive.  You may still hear the same thing, especially if playing a season, but it’s a huge upgrade on its predecessors.

The best part about 2K10′s audio though, is what is called ‘dynamic commentary’, which is part of a feature called ‘NBA Today’ (see below).  Effectively what this means is that if you are connected to the internet, the commentary will update itself according to what happens in the real world.  I was surprised enough when playing with the Indiana Pacers that Cheryl Miller started talking about Danny Granger’s plans to build a Bat Cave (which is relatively fresh news), but I guess I should expect more fresh bits of information like this now the real NBA season has commenced.

The sounds on the court are also very impressive, though to be honest I don’t think they break any new ground.  That said, it’s nice to see that they got the sound of the ball right when it hits the hardwood, the ring, the backboard, and when it swishes through the net.  The squeaking of the sneakers and the chatter amongst players are a given now in any basketball game, but at least they have been done well and don’t overshadow the things that truly matter.

Furthermore, the NBA 2K10 soundtrack is awesome, comprising a mix of songs from popular and up-and-coming artists.

In NBA Live 2010, there is a strong focus on re-creating the atmosphere of a real NBA game, and EA actually went out and recorded over 200 real crowd sounds from NBA games.  What this effectively means is that the crowd noises and intensity will differ depending on the teams that are playing and what is at stake.  For example, the atmosphere for a game between the Celtics and the Lakers in the NBA Finals will be a lot more electric than say a regular season game between the Pacers and the Thunder.

Personally, I think the dynamic commentary offered by 2K10 is a lot more impressive than the realistic atmospheres offered by Live 2010.

2kpacers

Gameplay (9/10)

Having been an NBA Live guy over the years, I was amazed by the gameplay that NBA 2K10 offered.  I had been told for years that 2K’s gameplay was a vast upgrade over Live, but it wasn’t until I played 2K10 that I realised I had been playing arcade-style basketball games for too long.  Granted, the differences in gameplay is not especially significant in the more recent versions of NBA Live (in particular Live 2010), but the difference is there.

Even if you are a superstar, you can’t just blow by any defender and finish above the rim in 2K10.  Boxing out is integral to rebounding.  Cutting and setting screens is imperative to getting open.  You can take risks by jumping into the lane to intercept passes, or you can try and deny your man the ball.  You can double team a guy and tie him up for the jump ball.  You can call an assortment of plays on the fly or from a time out.  It’s not perfect, but the gameplay in NBA 2K10 is the most realistic I have ever experienced.

Now, the basic controls are relatively simple, but if you want to be able to execute some of the more difficult moves it will take some time.  Moving around the court utilises the left stick, but unlike Live 2010 (which uses the right stick), 2K10 uses a combination of the left stick and the L2 button to pull of more complicated dribble moves (such as killer cross-overs and hesitationd dribbles).  Shooting can be done with either the square button or the right stick, though the latter offers more control over the type of shot you want to perform.   Leaners, fadeaways, bank shots, reverse layups, 360 dunks – all of these moves can be executed on demand, provided to know where and when to do it.  Post moves, on the other hand, involve a whole other set of controls.

The complexity of the controls can be offputting for those that just want to get into the action, but once you master them the game becomes that much better.  I would recommend using the various control tutorials and some one-on-one or two-on-two games to get the hang of things before testing them out in full five-on-five play.  Remember, not all players can execute all moves, so don’t be surprised if you turn the ball over if you try to do behind-the-back dribbles with Shaq.

Another plus for me was the stamina system.  You have your basic stamina bar but also a turbo bar which gives your player a burst of energy but only for short periods of time and diminishes as your stamina is drained, much like in real life.  When your player is feeling fatigue, a Gatorade cup will appear next to the bar.  What it means is that you can’t keep your finger on turbo the whole game and expect to get away with it.

On the down side, there are a couple of minor glitches, but none have been irksome enough for me to remember right now!  I have read about problems with the frame rate, particularly on the XBox 360, though it has not been very noticeable for me on the PS3.

Gameplay has been a huge focus for NBA Live 2010, but the word on the street (and my opinion) is that while it has improved significantly, it’s still not quite as realistic as 2K10.  Now for some people, especially those who like their NBA sims to still have a little bit of fantasy in them, might find Live 2010 the more enjoyable game.  Again, it is a matter of personal preference.

Presentation (8/10)

2K features a TV-style presentation that’s easy to like and get comfortable with.  You’ve got the pre-game rituals, the Sprite ‘Ice Cold’ keys to the game, the cheerleaders, the Slam Cam and ‘Moments of the Game’.  During timeouts and breaks in play, you might get updates on the league standings or league leaders.  The replays come just at the right time and for the right plays.  It is very much like a standard TV broadcast.

2K’s presentation is simple but effective.  What I like most is the post-game wrap up, which declares a ‘Jordan’ Player of the Game, complete with a package of highlights.  There’s also an assortment of cool things to check out after each game, including top moments, photographic stills and highlight packages for each player.

2kscreen1

On the other hand, I’ll be the first to admit that it took me a while to get used to the menus in NBA 2K10.  The game utilises a full screen, 9 block menu that can be accessed at just any time.  Pressing the circle button on one of these blocks may take you to another identical menu, and so forth.  If that sounds confusing it’s because it is.  Personally I prefer the conventional, line-by-line menus.  But you do get the hang of them after a while.

Features (9/10)

NBA 2K10 has a whole host of features and game modes.  There’s the old ’Quick Game’ (default set to last season’s finalists, the Lakers and the Magic), the ‘Blacktop’ mode which allows you to play streetball, the Rookie Challenge, the Association, Season and Playoff Modes, as well as Online Leagues.  You can also set up a ‘Situation’, or you can just Practice.  Note also the use of Living Rosters (for those connected to the net), which keeps the game fresh with up-to-date team and player information, reflecting roster changes, trades, injuries and even player ratings.

All of these things are great, but they are generally expected these days.  However, there are a couple of features that make NBA 2K10 stand out.  The first is ‘NBA Today’, which is a dynamic feature that delivers audio and visual presentations based on real-life news and games.  The dynamic commentary mentioned above is a part of this feature.  What you can also do (now that the season has started) is to mirror the real NBA by checking out what games are on the schedule for the day and you can jump in to play those games right away, either before or after or as it happens!

The second, and the most impressive feature of NBA 2K10 (in my humble opinion), is this thing called ‘My Player’ mode.  Gamers are used to creating the perfect dream player with max stats to dominate the opposition, but this is not what ‘My Player’ is about (that said, you can still create such a player for use in other game modes).

The NBA 2K10 Draft Combine mini-game which has to be purchased online gives you a taste of ‘My Player’ mode, but that’s for the privileged players that were fortunate enough to be drafted in the NBA draft.  ‘My Player’ is about the undrafted player with NBA aspirations.

You don’t start off as some kind of freak athlete destined to be a superstar in the NBA.  You have to work for it.  It is an unique game in many ways, but it is also extremely rewarding.  You start off creating a player, including their position and style of play, but regardless of what you do, your player will have some ridiculously low stats.  You will have to work hard through training drills and performing well in games to acquire skill points in order to improve.

The first goal is to perform well enough in the Summer League to be invited to an NBA Training Camp.  However, this doesn’t simply require scoring a whole bunch of points (which is difficult anyway due to poor stats and limited playing time).  The aim of ‘My Player’ is to be a team player that teammates approve.  A role player, if you will.  That makes sense because if you were good enough to be dominating everyone, you’d already be in the NBA.

How do you be a good team player?  Much like in real life.  Take good shots.  Don’t be a ball hog.  Box out your man on the rebound.  Finding the open teammate.  Set screens.  Lock down your defensive assignment.  Each time you do something good, you get a boost of approval.  Your teammate rating starts off a C, but if you play well, you could move up to as high as A+.  On the other hand, a terrible performance could see your rating drop to D or worse.

And so if you play well enough in the Summer League, you might get invites to NBA teams to participate in Training Camp.  And if you can make it through the ruthless cuts, you’ll be on the team.  If not, then it’s off to the NBA Development League (with real life teams and all).  The goal is to finally fulfill your dream of playing in the NBA.

What is important to note is that ‘My Player’ mode is truly a single-player simulation.  You cannot switch players in the middle of a game.  You’re the same guy, from beginning to end.  This may sound boring for some, but it is a surprisingly rich experience.  You can’t just stand around and wait to be passed the ball – you need to make an effort to get open.  You really have to play some defence.  I can’t recall how many times I tried to double team a player in the post, only to be burned by the open shot I gave up to the man I was supposed to guard.  Further, you don’t get to play every minute of the game.  If you start from the bench or get subbed off, you can watch the others play or you can simulate the game until your next appearance.  What it means is that you need to make the most of the limited minutes you have, much like a player struggling to make the NBA in real life.

Right now I am playing for the Orlando Magic on a short-term contract, averaging stats good enough to get consideration for the 6th Man Award.  Though a ‘scoring’ shooting guard, I have become somewhat of a hustle player, grabbing offensive rebounds for putbacks and deflecting passes into the lane.  It shows that the type of player you become depends entirely on you.

Another feature worth mentioning is that you can form a ‘Crew’ of ‘My Player’ mode ballers with your friends and go challenge other crews online.  Haven’t tried it yet but I’m sure it would be fun.  In all, ‘My Player’ is an excellent addition to the NBA 2K franchise.  There is ample room for improvement and there have already been plenty of complaints (such as restrictions in playing and simulation time, amongst other gameplay glitches), but as a concept it is terrific and what 2K has been able to accomplish in the mode’s maiden run is impressive.

Overall (8.8/10)

To sum it all up, NBA 2K10 is a realistic and innovative basketball experience that can keep you busily entertained for hours on end.

Having been an exclusive NBA Live gamer for many years, I don’t have a previous 2K title to use as a benchmark.  Nonetheless, there isn’t all that much to complain about in this game.  The visuals are the best of any basketball game I have ever seen.  The sound is also great, especially the dynamic commentary which keeps you from being bored to death by the repetition from games of old.

2K10′s gameplay is its core strength.  Playing NBA Live 2010, I did notice a vast improvement from the older titles but NBA 2K10 is still that little bit better when it comes to realism.  That said, there are still some minor issues – but there aren’t any deal breakers.  Hopefully the first downloadable patch, scheduled for release very shortly, will address the various nagging problems gamers have had with the game thus far.

In my view, what takes NBA 2K10 up a few levels from previous NBA sims I’ve played are ‘NBA Today’ and ‘My Player’.  The former is more polished than the latter, but both are hopefully going to be in all future incarnations of the game.  I’m glad that NBA Live 2010 was so robust this year and hopefully this will push both EA and 2K to kick it up another notch for 2011.

NBA 2K10 or NBA Live 2010?

October 30, 2009 in Basketball, Game Reviews

NBA2klivecompare

Do you notice much of a difference?

NBA 2K10 or NBA Live 2010?

The choice to buy NBA 2K10 was not easy.

I had been a life-long player of EA Sports’ NBA Live series (though I missed NBA Live 09) and it was comfortable to stick to what I already knew.  Though my friends have been telling me for years that the real king of NBA games is 2K, I just never made the switch.  I just kept buying it year after year, even though the braniacs at EA were always more focused on pointless things such as authentic tattoos and shoes rather than what really matters – the gameplay.

Is NBA Live back?

nbalive10coverHowever, leading up to the release of the game all I had been hearing was that Live was back.  This year, Mike Wang (formerly the lead developer at 2K) jumped ship and headed to work for EA, and the rumblings from the rumour mill were that NBA Live series was making a huge comeback to reclaim the throne from 2K.  Moreover, I played the demo for NBA Live 2010 on PS3 and it was very nice.  The graphics were superb as always, and the arena noises took it the atmosphere to another level.  Most of all, I noticed the distinct improvement in gameplay, the one thing that the Live series has been criticised for more than anything else over the last few years.

I needed to up the difficulty level a few notches, but gone are the days of being able to do whatever you want, whenever you want.  In the old days, as soon as you figure out how the AI works, it was all over for the computer, even on ‘Superstar’ level.  Well, now it’s a lot harder to complete a series of humanly impossible moves before spinning past four defenders then dunking on all of them.  Your teammates are now smarter and act more like players in real life.  Fast breaks are smooth(er).  Defense has been revamped.  Freestyle passing is a cool addition.  It was significantly better than any Live game I had played before.

On the other hand, 2K’s sample offering, a demo of its Draft Combine mini-game (I was too cheap to buy the full version) didn’t impress me all that much.  Sure, it was not in a proper arena so it was difficult to make a direct comparison to Live, but whether it was the player movement, sound, or graphics, it felt like Live was the better package.  Nevertheless, I did a fair bit of reading on the games and checked out the publicly available videos.  Even though there was the odd dissenter, the overwhelming consensus from gamers was that Live has indeed upped its game, but 2K still reigned supreme.

Further, while the Live promo videos looked good, 2K’s videos were mind-blowing.  I was shocked to find out that it was actual in-game footage.

The decision and verdict

2k10coverAnd so I had a dilemma on my hands.  Do I go for the game I’ve known for years and looked like a safe bet from the demo, or do I take the plunge and spend my hard-earned cash on the series everyone has been raving about but I had never tasted?  In the end, I made a rational choice and went with 2K10.  Having now played full versions of both games, I can say that this year there is no massive winner.  Both games are incredibly fun and look amazing, but the fact of the matter is, 2K is a more realistic basketball experience than Live.  If you want to go be able to dominate your opponents, perform sick cross-overs and streetball moves, go with Live.  But if you want a more realistic basketball simulation based on strategy, movement and tactics, then 2K is the answer.  This is not to say one game is clearly better than the other.  It’s a matter of what you’re looking for in a basketball game.  I was looking for realism.

Another factor that influenced my decision was my familiarity with the NBA Live series.  It was actually a lot more difficult to overcome than I thought it would be.  I had spent years with the Live presentations style, graphics, menus and in particular its control system.  When I initially tried to 2K demo, everything was different.  People tell me that the 2K graphics are better, but because I was so used to seeing Live’s player graphics, I couldn’t tell.  I still can’t.  Further, the 2K menus were initially confusing to use.  Worst of all, the controls were driving me crazy.  I was so used to using the right stick do perform dribble and spin moves (which is used for shooting in 2K) that I kept tossing up unwanted half-court shots.

Accordingly, I completely understand those who plan to continue sticking with the Live series, especially this year, when the gap between the two franchises is not very big.  However, if you are willing to spend a bit more time to learn the controls and get acquainted with the 2K series, I believe it will be a more rewarding experience.  Having played 2K10 for a few weeks now, I do notice the difference in gameplay.  The players’ movements are just that little more realistic and the game is more about learning how to break down the defence using smart, technical playmaking as opposed to using ankle-breaking highlight moves and exploiting deficiencies in the AI.

The biggest advantage that NBA 2K10 has over NBA Live 2010 is the new My Player mode.  It’s not even close to perfect, but it’s quite advanced for a brand new game mode and will likely eat up hours upon hours of your time.  For gamers tired of just winning championships year after year, My Player is a refreshing change that is unusually satisfying.  I’m sure Live will come up with something similar next year, but for now, 2K is the only game that has this excellent feature.

Anyway, it’s so far so good with NBA 2K10.  I don’t rule out hiring NBA Live 2010 from the video store to try the full game, but I certainly don’t regret the decision I made.

To see for yourself, check out some gameplay videos for both 2K10 and Live 2010 below.

 

Pulse Smartpen: write, record and convert to editable text!

October 30, 2009 in On Writing, Technology

smartpen

The Pulse Smartpen from Livescribe and the special 'dot' paper notepad

I feel almost obligated to share this nugget with my readers.

Recently, following a technology session at work, my wife went and bought me this thing called the Livescribe Pulse Smartpen.  This slightly fatter than normal, but still relatively lightweight pen, blew my world.

I once posted an article on this blog in which pondered whether I was more effective as a writer writing (ie pen on paper) or typing.  I concluded that I was more creative and came up with better material when writing on paper (at least for my novel), but the speed with which I could pump out words on the keyboard shifted the balance in favour of typing.

Well, the Pulse Smartpen may shift that balance once more.

Using some sort of hi-tech infra-red camera technology, state of the art recording capabilities and special ‘dot paper’ (virtually invisible to the naked eye), the pen allows the user to record sounds while you write, and effortlessly links the audio to the written material.  And more importantly for writers, you can transfer the handwritten notes into editable text on the computer (with a special program).

In other words, I can utilise the pen to take advantage of my improved creativity when writing with pen on paper, while being able to simultaneously save time by converting the writing to editable text in my novel writing program without having to type it up all over again!  What it also means is that I can carry my Livescribe notepad (containing the special paper) wherever I go and write whenever I want, and not feel like I am wasting time because I’d have to type it all up when I get home.

As GOB Bluth (from Arrested Development) once blurted out loud in response to a talking magazine: “I didn’t even know this kind of technology existed!”

Recording function

This is actually quite simple.  For instance, if I’m taking verbal instructions from a client or attending a lecture, I just have to turn on the pen, tap the ‘record’ button at the bottom of the paper and write away.  If I miss something, never fear.  All I have to do later is tap my pen on the page at the spot where I struggled to keep up, and the audio recording will start playing from the exact point in time I wrote those words (or drew those pictures).

And if you download a program called Livescribe Desktop from the website, you can load the written pages and the audio onto your computer for long-term storage (using a USB dock which you place the pen in, and which also acts as a battery recharger).  If you register the pen, you’ll even get some free web storage so you can upload your notes and audio for access on other computers.

This function has already come in very handy at work, especially during long conference calls and when receiving instructions from a busy superior who might not have the patience to keep repeating him/herself.  Gold!

smartpen2

This gives you a fair idea of the size of the pen

Converting to editable text

Note this is actually not a part of the Pulse Smartpen’s package.  The program which converts handwriting to editable text is an additional add-on program which you can download for free as a 30-day trial, but costs around US$30 to buy.  However, for me it was well worth it.

The way it works is this: after uploading the written pages (which don’t have to be accompanied by audio) to Livescribe Desktop, if you have the relevant program installed, you can click on a little button that converts the handwriting to editable text automatically.  This text can then be moved to your preferred word processing program.  And voila, it’s as though you typed it all up in the first place.

So far I’ve written about 8 or 9 pages of my novel on the train on my way to and from work, and it has been converted into text and cut and paste straight into NewNovelist.  No more excuses for not being able to progress it every day!

Downside

As with most things that sound too good to be true, the Pulse Smartpen is too, to a certain extent.

First of all, it’s not cheap, so if you don’t utilise it fully it’s not really worth it.  Depending on the storage size of the pen (1G, 2G or 4G), you’re looking at around US$150-200+, and most likely substantially more if you are buying it from retailers outside the US (eg A$329 for a 2G pen according to the Australian website).

Secondly, you need that special ‘dot paper’ to get the pen to work.  My pen came with a 200-page notepad (100 pages, double-sided), and once that runs out you have to buy new ones.  However, you can, if you have access to a colour laser printer, print out your own paper in small amounts at a time.  I do have access to one at work, but the multiple firewalls are preventing me from printing them at the moment (mental note to find a way around it).

A connected issue is the special ink cartridge that the pen requires.  I am quite certain that you’ll need to buy those too when the ink runs out, and the cartridges themselves are rather small, so I imagine that would happen relatively often, adding a further expense.

Thirdly, the conversion to editable text is nowhere near perfect.  The conversion process can be slow (one page at a time) and if you have unruly handwriting, the conversions can lead to some crazy results.  You can try to mitigate that to some extent by inserting special words in the custom dictionary and specify auto-conversions for certain words that keep getting converted wrong.  While it does save you a lot of time, it doesn’t save you as much time as you wish it could.  Put it this way – I would be very surprised if there isn’t a solid handful of manual edits and format changes required for each page of writing I convert.

Verdict

I’m usually pretty retarded when it comes to technological advancements, so I’m clueless as to whether there are similar products or products that achieve the same results out there on the market.  With that in mind, I personally think the Pulse Smartpen is awesome, for both work and writing purposes.

As I have an extraordinarily short attention span, the ability to record important conversations (especially surreptitiously) is invaluable at work.  I guess it allows me to be that little bit lazier but it’s a safety net I’d much rather have than not.

Equally important to me is the pen’s potential to convert hand-written pages to typed font.  While the conversion is far from seamless, it allows me to write in places and circumstances I wouldn’t usually be able to.  For a person that can’t seem to find any time to write, this makes the Pulse Smartpen a worthwhile investment.

Bad Behavior has blocked 743 access attempts in the last 7 days.