<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review: Star Trek (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/</link>
	<description>Creativity is a muscle that needs to be exercised</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacejmiller</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>pacejmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 21:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  First person I&#039;ve met that hated the movie!  Trekkies included!

I don&#039;t understand why the time travel makes no sense.  I thought Nero had no choice about when he would travel to and it was pretty straight forward.  But I can&#039;t be bothered trying to remember it all.

By the way, isn&#039;t it Trekkie as opposed to Trekker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  First person I&#8217;ve met that hated the movie!  Trekkies included!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the time travel makes no sense.  I thought Nero had no choice about when he would travel to and it was pretty straight forward.  But I can&#8217;t be bothered trying to remember it all.</p>
<p>By the way, isn&#8217;t it Trekkie as opposed to Trekker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratboy</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-571</guid>
		<description>JJ Abrams couldnt direct his way out of a paper bag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ Abrams couldnt direct his way out of a paper bag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratboy</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-570</guid>
		<description>oh boy,have you got it wrong.Never been a trekker surely shows.This is possibly the worst ST movie ever ever made.For a start i dont know how any one can understand the time line.Does nero travel back in time before or after he attacks the ship that baby kirk is on.?I f he attacks then goes back in time.In which point of time does he go back to.?because kirk woudnt even be born.If he goes back in time and then attacks,what is he doing while Kirks growing up?.Playing hoola hoops.
The plot is lame,unoriginal been much like like Nemisis.Yet another evil offshoot of the Romulans hell bent on destroying the federation,with yes another doomsday weapon.Even his ship looks similar to Chinzons,with its long appendages and spikey things coming out of it.
Details like loading spaceships with old forklift trucks,when antigrav machines have been invented.Whats the go there?.Kirk is way out of character when it comes to the ladys.In the original series he wouldnt even touch his lovely yeoman,so why on earth is he bonking on with a green alien.I am a bit of a trekker but not that hard core and i think that this movie sucks.
Like most movies they make these days,it concentrates to much on sex and glamour,and has no soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh boy,have you got it wrong.Never been a trekker surely shows.This is possibly the worst ST movie ever ever made.For a start i dont know how any one can understand the time line.Does nero travel back in time before or after he attacks the ship that baby kirk is on.?I f he attacks then goes back in time.In which point of time does he go back to.?because kirk woudnt even be born.If he goes back in time and then attacks,what is he doing while Kirks growing up?.Playing hoola hoops.<br />
The plot is lame,unoriginal been much like like Nemisis.Yet another evil offshoot of the Romulans hell bent on destroying the federation,with yes another doomsday weapon.Even his ship looks similar to Chinzons,with its long appendages and spikey things coming out of it.<br />
Details like loading spaceships with old forklift trucks,when antigrav machines have been invented.Whats the go there?.Kirk is way out of character when it comes to the ladys.In the original series he wouldnt even touch his lovely yeoman,so why on earth is he bonking on with a green alien.I am a bit of a trekker but not that hard core and i think that this movie sucks.<br />
Like most movies they make these days,it concentrates to much on sex and glamour,and has no soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacejmiller</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>pacejmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Oh man!  That means I didn&#039;t see any of the endings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man!  That means I didn&#8217;t see any of the endings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-568</guid>
		<description>No no no. The striker thing is in every print of the movie. The extra scenes are at the very end, after all the credits roll up.  Just do like I do, whenever you go back to the theater, sneak into a screening and watch the extra scenes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no no. The striker thing is in every print of the movie. The extra scenes are at the very end, after all the credits roll up.  Just do like I do, whenever you go back to the theater, sneak into a screening and watch the extra scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacejmiller</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>pacejmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-567</guid>
		<description>What???  I thought they showed all 3!  That&#039;s brutal!  Also very unfair.  I got the one where Striker got pulled up and arrested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What???  I thought they showed all 3!  That&#8217;s brutal!  Also very unfair.  I got the one where Striker got pulled up and arrested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Matt, Wolverine has it&#039;s moments for sure but it&#039;s nowhere near the awesomeness of Star Trek or even the Second X-Men movie for that matter.

Pace, there are 3 extra scenes after the credits but each reel only carries 1.  Depending on where you go see it, everyone sees a different scene, You may get the Wolverine at a bar in Japan or you may get the Deadpool scene. I don&#039;t know or have heard what the third one is about.
When I saw it, I got the Deadpool (sequel! sequel!) scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, Wolverine has it&#8217;s moments for sure but it&#8217;s nowhere near the awesomeness of Star Trek or even the Second X-Men movie for that matter.</p>
<p>Pace, there are 3 extra scenes after the credits but each reel only carries 1.  Depending on where you go see it, everyone sees a different scene, You may get the Wolverine at a bar in Japan or you may get the Deadpool scene. I don&#8217;t know or have heard what the third one is about.<br />
When I saw it, I got the Deadpool (sequel! sequel!) scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacejmiller</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>pacejmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be stoooooopid Matt - I&#039;ve seen both movies and Star Trek kills Wolverine, though the latter was actually pretty good too.  If you have TWO gold tickets, why not watch both??  If you must watch just one, then Star Trek is the one to see.

Really, do yourself a favour and watch Star Trek.  Star Wars is a great franchise in its own right, but it has nothing to do with this!  And it&#039;s not geeky.  The old stuff, maybe, but not this reboot.

BUT - if you go see Wolverine, remember to stick around until the end of the credits because there are 3 additional scenes.  Unfortunately I didn&#039;t know and walked out after the first one (who would have thought they&#039;d have 3??)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be stoooooopid Matt &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen both movies and Star Trek kills Wolverine, though the latter was actually pretty good too.  If you have TWO gold tickets, why not watch both??  If you must watch just one, then Star Trek is the one to see.</p>
<p>Really, do yourself a favour and watch Star Trek.  Star Wars is a great franchise in its own right, but it has nothing to do with this!  And it&#8217;s not geeky.  The old stuff, maybe, but not this reboot.</p>
<p>BUT &#8211; if you go see Wolverine, remember to stick around until the end of the credits because there are 3 additional scenes.  Unfortunately I didn&#8217;t know and walked out after the first one (who would have thought they&#8217;d have 3??)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Ho</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-564</guid>
		<description>i just have no interest in watching this movie - can&#039;t bring myself to watch a star trek movie. maybe cause i feel its a) too geeky b) i&#039;m loyal to the star wars franchise. 

i have two gold tickets, so i might watch wolverine.

AND

may the force be with you!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just have no interest in watching this movie &#8211; can&#8217;t bring myself to watch a star trek movie. maybe cause i feel its a) too geeky b) i&#8217;m loyal to the star wars franchise. </p>
<p>i have two gold tickets, so i might watch wolverine.</p>
<p>AND</p>
<p>may the force be with you!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacejmiller</title>
		<link>http://pacejmiller.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>pacejmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 08:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacejmiller.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-563</guid>
		<description>Checking things out now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checking things out now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 555/556 objects using disk: basic

Served from: pacejmiller.com @ 2012-02-23 07:48:52 -->
