You are browsing the archive for 2009 April.

Book Review: The Book Thief

April 23, 2009 in Book Reviews, On Writing

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak

Recently I’ve been envious of a lot of other writers (pretty much after every book I read).  It may be the way they can create vivid images in my mind with apparent ease, or the way they can use dialogue to make their characters come alive effortlessly – or just their success.   Well, add Markus Zusak, the award-winning Australian author of The Book Thief, to that list.

I bought The Book Thief almost a year ago, but it wasn’t until my recent European trip that I actually got around to reading it.  Here’s what I thought of it.

What is it about?

I never like to give away too much plot, so all I will say is that The Book Thief centers around a young girl named Liesel Meminger (who, of course, is the Book Thief), and the story takes place during World War II in Nazi Germany.  Sounds pretty familiar right?  But don’t be tricked by the premise.  The Diary of Anne Frank it is not.  The Book Thief is, without a doubt, one of the most unusual books I have ever read.

What makes it unusual?

For starters, the storyteller of the novel is Death.  Yes, that’s right, Death.  A rather apt choice considering that the story takes place during the Holocaust.  However, despite the grim topic and the grimmer narrator, Zusak manages to convey the story in a (for the most part) lighthearted manner that is brimming with its young protagonist’s curiosity and mischief.  Perhaps it takes away some of that realism and genuine horror, but having the story told by a character supposedly detached from humanity was eerily effective.  Further, the story is told largely from the point of view of the Germans.  In fact, there’s only one main Jewish character in the whole book.

The Book Thief is also a love affair with books – and a examination of the power of words and stories.  Indeed, Zusak alludes to the view that Hitler was able to become who he was because he was a master of words – a master at using words to manipulate people.  He didn’t need to be big and strong or wealthy, and he didn’t need a gun.  He became the most powerful man in the world because he understood the power of words.

So, how was it?

To be honest, it took a while for me to get into The Book Thief.  Not because it was boring (though it was slow in certain parts), but because of the book’s unusual style.  The narrative jumps around a bit, and there’s the occasional poetic extract in bold from the narrator that breaks things up.  Each section of the book also has a tiny summary at the front, comprised primarily of single words, short phrases and things that don’t make much sense until you finish the section.  It was highly unusual.

Furthermore, despite the scope of the events surrounding the characters, The Book Thief is a very personal story.  It is essentially focused on a single town, a single street (which happens to be the street on which the protagonist lives) and on a small handful of characters.

Even when I finally got used to it, for a while I wondered where the story was going and what it was getting at.  Dare I say I even found it difficult to read on, despite the fact that the book was clearly fabulously written.

But I’m glad I did, because gradually, I realized that it wasn’t all just aimless wandering.  Before long, I realized that I actually cared about the characters.  I realized that I was sympathizing with Germans in the Holocaust.  Though their suffering paled in comparison to the Jews, that does not mean they were not victims too.

By the end of the book, I was deeply moved.  At some point (and I don’t know exactly where, except that it was quite late), The Book Thief stops being just an exceptionally written novel – it simply becomes exceptional.  It’s one of those books with the ability to linger in your mind long after the final page.

Overall, I’d say it was a good book that unfortunately didn’t become great until it neared the end.  Perhaps a little too long and a little tedious at times, but there was no doubting how well it was written.  And it does pack an emotional punch at the end.  3.5 out of 5 stars!

Zuzak’s writing style

While the novel has its problems it does not mean the author is not worthy of praise.  I grew increasingly envious of Markus Zusak’s writing ability as the book progressed.  In particular, Zusak has a knack for descriptions (which I consider one of my weakest points as a writer).  In The Book Thief, some of his descriptions are so out of the ordinary and so brilliant that it made me shake my head.  Especially those relating to character traits.  For instance, Liesel’s foster mother is repeated referred to as a ‘cardboard woman’; her foster father has ‘silver eyes’ and her best friend has ‘yellow hair’.  These may seem unremarkable but whenever I saw these references in the book I would instantly recognize the character.  These images are so ingrained in my memory that I can still immediately come up with them off the top of my head despite having finish the book weeks ago.  Some may be unimpressed with his overuse of metaphors (like ‘the sky was the colour of Jews’) or even find his style pretentious, but as an aspiring writer trying to learn the craft, I was intrigued by his confident use of unusual descriptions and imagery.

I also found Zusak to be a great craftsman who is able to shape a story with control and subtlety – he doesn’t rub anything in your face.  He builds it up, gives you the chance to learn the characters.  At the same time he gives you room to think about and interpret the imagery (and there is a lot of that, especially in the short stories and hand-drawn artwork in the book).  Even if you don’t enjoy the book, it doesn’t hurt reading it just to see and learn from the way Zusak writes (regardless of whether you like his style or not).

It doesn’t appear that Zusak was naturally gifted with these skills.  I just read a fascinating interview with the author entitled ‘Why I write’ in which he describes his struggles with writing (see here).  It also has some terrific insights into the craft and process of writing which I found very useful.  Another great article on his personal journey in creating The Book Thief can be found here.  Just shows it’s not easy coming up with an international bestseller.

Maybe there’s still hope for me.

Pizzas we had in Italy! (with pics)

April 22, 2009 in Food, Travel

Rummaging through some more photos from our recent European adventure I came across a common theme: Pizza!

So I thought I’d post some of the pictures we took of the pizzas (and calzones) we had throughout Italy.  Unfortunately, we didn’t get photos of all of them.  These were the only ones I remembered to snap before we devoured them!

First off, Pisa – it was our first day, fresh off the plane, and we stopped for a short visit to see the Leaning Tower.  After much wandering we settled on this touristy-looking restaurant and sat outside, with the Tower still within our sights from where we ate.  We shared a sausage pizza, which was average, a tad on the salty side.  We also had a ham and mushroom calzone.  Those who follow my Travel Diary will know that I had the best calzones ever in Barcelona, so when I saw calzone on the menu I just about flipped out.  Unfortunately this was a traditional calzone (unlike the ‘gondola’ style ones I had in Barcelona) and it was surprisingly bland (though still salty).  6/10 for the pizza and 5/10 for the calzone.  They weren’t bad, but this was Italy, and my expectations were high.  Check out the pics below.

A Pizza in Pisa

A Pizza in Pisa

Ham and Mushroom Calzone

Ham and Mushroom Calzone

Next stop, Florence – where we went into one of these little pizza shops on the side of the street, lured by the tasty smells emanating from their ovens.  This place sold squarish pizzas, and they sold it according to weight (I believe).  We had ourselves a square pizza (either sausage or meatball, can’t recall) and a calzone.  This place was about half the price of the Pisa restaurant but was much tastier.  8/10 for the square pizza and 7/10 for the calzone. Photo below.

Square Pizza and Calzone - cheap but tasty

Square Pizza and Calzone - cheap but tasty

Venice was next, and I’m sure we had more than just the one taken below but I must have forgotten to take photos before eating them – a sign that they were too enticing!  This one was prosciutto I think, and we got it in one of those typical pizza vendors in the narrow streets of Venice near St Mark’s Square.  Very delicious and very big, with a thin base.  Very cheap too, like 2 or 3 Euros a slice!  I’d have to give this one a 9/10!

Big slice pizzas in Venice

Big slice pizzas in Venice

Of course, we ventured into Rome, where we stayed for 4 nights and enjoyed pizza I think almost once a day (what else is there to eat in Italy?).  I know, fat city, but we had to try as many as we could get our hands on.  The two photos below were from this family Italian restaurant on the same street as our hotel, very close to Roma Termini station.  We had a plain Margherita (with garlic) and another, you guessed it, sausage pizza.  Both were nice, but very different.  The Margherita had a very crispy base, and it was simple yet flavoursome.  The sausage one had a thicker base and had cheese on top, but it was a little stingy on the sausage.  I’d give each 7.5/10.

Your plain Magherita in Rome

Your plain Margherita in Rome

Another sausage pizza

Another sausage pizza

Just before we left Rome, we had one last meal at Roma Termini station.  We went for this average, chain-store looking place called Spizzico and got 2 slices there.  Can’t remember the flavours but one was plain and the other had meat with buffalo mozzarela, but both were sensational.  Surprisingly, the best pizza we had on the entire trip!  Hot and juicy and the flavour was simply superb, really hitting the spot.  It was so good that we got another slice (the meat one), but for some reason it wasn’t quite as good as the first, as it was slightly salty.  I guess that just means they’re a bit inconsistent.  Nevertheless, I give their pizzas a 9.5/10 (because nothing’s perfect).  See below.

The best pizza was had in Italy

The best pizza we had in Italy

Spizzico at Roma Termini Station

Spizzico at Roma Termini Station

Lastly, here is a photo of another pizza was had, but it was taken in Freiburg, in the South-Western corner of Germany (in the Black Forest), so technically it doesn’t belong here.  We had this at a restaurant near the train stration that was supposed to serve both German and Italian food, but it was all Italian from what we could tell…Nevertheless, we had this one with 2 types of meat and mushrooms.  It was okay, a bit on the oily side (evidence below).  Clearly not up to the Italian standard.  I’d give it a 5/10.

Pizza in Germany too

Pizza in Germany too

We haven’t had pizza for a while…

Thoughts on Dan Brown’s latest: The Lost Symbol!

April 22, 2009 in Book Reviews, Entertainment

[Update: I have read the book and my review can be found here!]

Dan Brown’s latest: The Lost Symbol!

I just read that after six long years following the controversial best-seller The Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown is finally going to be releasing his brand new book, titled The Lost Symbol, in September 2009!

Has it been that long already?  The movie adaptation of  Angels & Demons, the prequel to DVC, is only being released next month.  All indications are that it will be a vast improvement on the DVC movie.  At least they fixed up Tom Hank’s hair this time.

Apparently, Brown’s publisher Knopf DoubleDay, has already ordered 6.5 million copies of The Lost Symbol to be printed in its maiden run.  The question is – will it be enough, considering DVC sold over 80 million copies worldwide?

I thought THIS was the 'Lost' symbol...

I thought THIS was the 'Lost' symbol...

So, what’s it about?

According to reports, the book is another Robert Langdon adventure, this time taking place in Washington DC over the course of 12 hours, and will involve Freemasonry (for those who don’t know what that is, here’s the Wikipedia entry).  So expect another fast-paced, page-turning thrill ride with some interesting bits of thought-provoking information (that may or may not be controversial) tossed your way throughout.

Expectations?

I have relatively modest expectations for The Lost Symbol.

To begin with, everyone that has read more than one Dan Brown novel knows that he is (or at least has been thus far) a bit of a one-trick pony in that his story structures almost always follow the same broad methodical formula: a mysterious prologue (usually involving a death), kicking off a whirlwind series of events that revolve around a secret or artifact of monumental importance; an intelligent hero trying to put the pieces of the puzzle together in limited time while being pursued by a sinister (faceless) enemy; and a twist at the end that reveals all.

It’s difficult to feel sorry for someone who has sold hundreds of millions of books worldwide, but it’s frightening to think about the amount of pressure Dan Brown must be feeling.  Just how to you follow up one of the most popular books of all time?  The way I see it, there are two general possibilities for this book.  Brown can either go with the formulaic structure that has served him so well in the past (leading to a stinker), or he can try something new and completely different and surprise everyone.  I have a feeling that after so many years since the success of DVC and the weight of an entire generation of fans on his shoulders, Dan Brown will choose the latter path and surprise us this time.  Hopefully.  Why else would he take so many years to finish it?

I remember years ago (could have been 3 or 4 or more) when it was first announced that Dan Brown’s new novel was forthcoming.  It was called The Solomon Key, and it got everyone extremely excited for a while.  I particularly recall seeing whole books written by other losers predicting what The Solomon Key was going to be all about, based on a couple of random clues given by the author.  How ridiculous is that?  Well, I’m sure Mr Brown has learned his lesson and won’t be too keen on spilling the beans on his future novels too early from now on.  I thought The Solomon Key was eventually dumped (as we never saw it), but as it turns out, it was just the ‘working title’ of The Lost Symbol, so it will be interesting to see whether those losers were correct in their guesses.

I must say though, The Lost Symbol isn’t a name that instills a lot of confidence in the book itself.  I actually prefer The Solomon Key.  After all these years of waiting, couldn’t they have come up with something better?  Something a little less generic?  Maybe they did it on purpose to protect the plot.

In any case, there is one thing for sure – The Lost Symbol is going to be nowhere as controversial as DVC.  I don’t think Dan Brown can make it more controversial even if he wanted to.  I’m personally expecting it to be an exciting read, but certainly not on the mindblowing level of DVC, simply because I can’t imagine Freemasonry capable of being a topic that is more explosive than Jesus.  Judging from the information we’ve been given so far, I’m guessing that The Lost Symbol will be something like a dramatization of half a season of 24, with Robert Langdon as a wussy, intellectual version of Jack Bauer.

Final thoughts

I have a lot to thank DVC for because it got me back into reading.  I remember when word first started spreading about the book.  At the time, I was doing some reading, but it was pretty sporadic; I’d probably read 2 or 3 books a year, if that.  Anyway, I was in Hong Kong on a legal clerkship and one of the partners just kept raving on about the book, so I decided to buy it – and it blew me away!  Of course, I then went and got the rest of Brown’s books, and things just snow-balled from there.  Before I knew it I was reading 10 books a year, mostly on the train to and from work (and if it was good I’d read more at home).

Needless to say, we also have a lot to hate DVC for because it kicked off an avalanche of shithouse copycat books that tried to cash in on the book’s success (that is, mixing facts and legend in a fast-paced action story), not to mention those annoying ‘guide’ books that attempted to ‘unveil the truth behind the myth’ by dissect every line of the novel in excrutiating detail.  Even now in book stores I see a lot of similar novels with similar covers and storylines, and they all have something to do with a race against time to find some mythical artifact or unveil some deep-hidden mystery that’s been lost for centuries.  I’m sure some of them are good, probably even better than what Dan Brown has to offer, but the market is so saturated with these books now that it’s hard to separate the pretenders from the contenders.

Neuschwanstein Castle!

April 21, 2009 in Travel

[Update: Travel Diary finally fully up-to-date now with pictures added!]

I finally got around to sorting through some of the photos from my second big European adventure, and this time I’ve decided to post some photos of one of the best attractions in Europe (and certainly the No. 1 in Germany) – Neuschwanstein Castle!

I ranked Neuschwanstein Castle near Fussen (a 2-hour train ride south of Munich) as the No. 2 attraction in my European Adventure Round-Up, and with good reason too – it’s a magical place and a must-visit for anyone who has ever had a thing for pretty castles.  And no, you don’t have to be obsessed with the Disney Castle (which was inspired by Neuschwanstein) to enjoy it.

We went towards the end of April, when there was still snow covering the grass and made everything exceptionally beautiful, but I heard it can be equally amazing (albeit in a different way) during the summer, when the Castle attracts its largest crowds.

You can easily book a tour from any of the local tour companies when you get there, even on the day (you’ll find their brochures everywhere, and most of their offices are near the main train station).  Or if you prefer to save some money, you can just as easily figure things out for yourself by buying your own train, bus and entry tickets.  The tour guides provide a little bit of extra info (not much, to be honest), but really their job is just to organise the ticket-buying, so if you know what you’re doing then I’d recommend saving some money and doing things yourself.  It’s more flexible that way anyway.

For full details of our trip to Neuschwanstein, check out my (now fully updated- at last) Travel Diary!

So without further ado, here are the photos.  Like my Prague pics, these were taken with a Fujifilm FinePix F20 (still don’t know what this is), with the size reduced.  Of course, the photos cannot compare to seeing the real thing in person…

Neuschwanstein from afar, before the steady climb

Neuschwanstein from afar, before the steady climb

This is Hohenschwangau Castle nearby, which you can also visit (we didn't)

This is Hohenschwangau Castle nearby, which you can also visit (we didn't)

The surrounding hills of our walk up to the Castle

The surrounding hills of our walk up to the Castle

Getting closer...

Getting closer...

We're here!

We're here!

If you curl around the back of the Castle you can catch these spectacular views!

If you curl around the back of the Castle you can catch these spectacular views!

Hohenschwangau (the ugly step sister) from afar

Hohenschwangau (the ugly step sister) from afar

Another view of the Castle from a different angle

Another view of the Castle from a different angle

No photos inside the Castle!...oops

No photos inside the Castle!...oops

Farewell, Neuschwanstein

Farewell, Neuschwanstein

2009 NBA Playoff Predictions: First Round

April 17, 2009 in Basketball, NBA

Here are my predictions for the first round of the 2009 NBA Playoff (set to kick off on Saturday18 April 2009).  This is one of the most intriguing first rounds in years, where almost every lower seed at least has a chance of pulling off the upset (in my opinion anyway).  Each series is first to 4 wins (max of 7 games).

Eastern Conference

1 Cleveland Cavaliers (66-16) vs 8 Detroit Pistons (39-43)

Prediction: Cavs in 5

With the likely MVP Lebron James leading Cleveland to the best record in the NBA, it’s hard to pick against them.  Their confidence is sky high and they’ve played with a swagger (s0me say arrogance) all year.  Detroit, on the other hand, has been in complete disarray since the Allen Iversion trade, looking nothing like the perrenial 50-win team they had been for the last 6 or 7 years.  I was close to calling this series a sweep, but I think the Pistons have too much pride for that to happen, and perhaps might be able to catch the Cavs off-guard in one of the games, but no more than that.

2 Boston Celtics (62-20) vs 7 Chicago Bulls (41-41)

Prediction: Celtics in 6

This is a hard one to call.  Boston hasn’t looked so vulnerable all season, with emotional leader Kevin Garnett possibly out for the entire playoffs.  Conversely, the Bulls have streaked to the 7th seed and with exciting rookie Derrick Rose leading the way, they must be feeling good about their chances.  However, it’s difficult to deny the 21 game gap between the two teams and the fact that the Celtics are the defending champs.  There’s no doubt they’ll be playing their hearts out until KG gets back (if he does), and in any event, their record without KG has still been pretty impressive.

3 Orlando Magic (59-23) vs 6 Philadephia 76ers (41-41)

Prediction: Magic in 6

I was tempted to say Orlando in 4 or 5 because I think they are that much better than the 76ers,  but their play to close out the season hasn’t been particularly inspiring.  However, Philly hasn’t been playing particularly strong lately themselves, so the outcome is a bit up in the air.  On top of that, Orlando has been nursing some injuries, so I don’t think it will be as easy as some think.

4 Atlanta Hawks (47-35) vs 5 Miami Heat (43-39)

Prediction: Heat in 6

Going with gut instinct on this one.  The two teams have similar records though Atlanta has home court advantage – but Miami has Dwayne Wade.  I’m expecting a spectacular series from him and I don’t think anyone on the Hawks can stop him.

Western Conference

1 LA Lakers (65-17) vs 8 Utah Jazz (48-34)

Prediction: Lakers in 4

I want to believe that Utah can pull out a game or two, but I think the Lakers are just too strong and too confident.  Carlos Boozer hasn’t seemed right all season and the Jazz haven’t played well to end the season.  The Lakers will be looking to come out and make a statement in the first round so they can intimidate the other teams they’ll meet later.

2 Denver Nuggets (54-28) vs 7 New Orleans (49-33)

Prediction: Nuggets in 7

There’s only 5 games separating the 2nd and 7th seeds, so I think home court advantage will play a big factor.  I’m think Chris Paul will be sensational but Denver will prevail in the end.

3 San Antonio (54-28) vs 6 Dallas Mavericks (50-32)

Prediction: Mavericks in 6

I feel a little sorry for the Spurs, because they’ll have their hands full without Manu Ginobili and with Duncan only at half-strength.  No doubt Tony Parker will absolutely burn Jason Kidd this series but I don’t think he win this series alone.

4 Portland Trailblazers (54-28) vs Houston Rockets (53-29)

Prediction: Rockets in 6

Even though these Rockets don’t have much playoff experience beyond the first round, they at least have more experience than the Blazers, and I think ultimately that will be a factor.  If Yao has a big series I can’t see Houston losing.  Portland doesn’t have anyone that can stop him, and they have rugged defenders such as Ron Artest and Shane Battier to throw at Brandon Roy.

Bad Behavior has blocked 233 access attempts in the last 7 days.