You are browsing the archive for 2009 January.

Using modern language and slang in fantasy writing?

January 24, 2009 in Fantasy, Novel, On Writing

dialogueOne advice I’ve read more than a few times is: avoid using modern language in fantasy writing – in particular, in writing dialogue.

I’m just trying to gauge to what extent that advice applies – and if there are any exceptions or boundaries.

Of course, I understand frowning upon the use of modern terms, ’hip’ phrases, abbreviated words, slang, etc  in stories with a historical context – because it’s inaccurate and takes the reader out of the context – but what about in fantasy?

After all, it is a fantasy story.  If the reader can suspend their belief sufficiently to believe that a world of sorcery and magical creatures exists AND that the characters speak English, then why can’t those characters use some modern language in their conversations?  Wouldn’t the modern reader be able to associate more with the characters?

Read the rest of this entry →

Novel writing: is too much dialogue bad?

January 23, 2009 in Fantasy, Novel, On Writing

I’m pleased to report that I had a very productive day working on my fantasy novel today (which means I did not do any study whatsoever) – almost 7,000 words!

However, just having a quick browse through all my recent stuff, I noticed a significant part of it is just dialogue.  All dialogue.

So that got me thinking.  Is having a lot of dialogue in a novel good or bad?  Does it kill the action?  Do I need to pull it back a little?

My protagonist has essentially just started his adventure now, but there’s still a lot about this fantasy world that I haven’t yet revealed to the reader.  Rather than using large paragraphs to spell it out, I’ve tried to incorporate as much of the unveiling of this world through discussions between the characters.  Is this a good thing or a bad thing? 

I just don’t know anymore…all I know is that I want to get to the action, and I can see it right in front of me…

Top 5 films of 2008!

January 23, 2009 in Entertainment, Movie Reviews

I was just doing an online poll (www.abc.net.au/atthemovies/) of the top 5 movies of 2008.  The site provides a long list of films released in Australia in 2008 (which means some more recent films may not have made it – eg ALL of the best picture nominees for this year’s Oscars), from which users would first pick a shortlist.  And from that shortlist, the top 5 would be selected.

I was surprised.  2008 will always be remembered as the year Obama became president and the world economy went to hell.  But it also had some very decent films.  Very memorable ones.

So without further delay, here’s the 5 films I ended up with, in no particular order (drumroll please):

  • There Will Be Blood
  • Taken
  • The Dark Knight
  • Iron Man
  • Burn After Reading*

* I had picked Lust, Caution first, but switched at the last minute.  I suppose Lust, Caution was the better film, but I enjoyed Burn After Reading more, so there.

The results were totally unexpected.  There Will Be Blood was a classic, so that was a no-brainer.  I don’t usually rate action films that highly, but Taken was the best action film I had seen in a really long time.  I surprised myself by having 2 superhero movies in the list, but these (The Dark Knight and Iron Man) are undoubtedly 2 of the best superhero movies ever made.  Burn After Reading is the type of movie people either loved or hated, and I think to some extent it depends on the mood you’re in at the time of viewing.  I was in one of those moods, I guess, so I found it absolutely hilarious (though I may not get the same result on a second viewing).  Plus I’m a big fan of the Coen brothers and Fargo is one of my favourites of all-time, so there was also a little natural bias.

I should say that this is really more a list of my 5 favourite films of 2008 rather than necessarily the 5 best films.  Nevertheless…

What were your top 5?

Update: Golden Globe Film Reviews

January 23, 2009 in Movie Reviews

I did a post not long ago reviewing the films that were nominated for the Golden Globes.  I guess I should now also be adding the Oscar nominated films to that list.

Since that post, I’ve seen a couple more: WALL-E and Gran Torino (the latter was not nominated at the Oscars though).  See the short reviews (from Flixter) below (ratings out of 5):

walleWALL-E (3.5 stars)

 A very different animated film. I suppose it was well done, with amazing visuals (but nothing revoluntionary) and incredibly little dialogue, instead preferring to rely on the simplicity of the story, the cuteness of the characters and scattered humour to keep audiences interested. It also had a strong message about the environment and inactivity. But at the end of the day, it was still just another animated film. It certainly had its moments, but it’s going to take much much more for these types of films to seriously impress me (I should mention I’m not usually a big fan of animated films).

gran-torinoGran Torino (4.5 stars)

 The story of an angry, racist, lonely old man and his relationship with his Hmong (Asian) neighbours. It was far from a perfect film – parts of it were stereotypical and heavy-handed, and some scenes lacked effectiveness. Nevertheless, it’s a film that moved me for one reason or another, and it’s a film that is likely to resonate with a lot of viewers long after the final scene. It touches on many important themes – life, death, family, loneliness, religion, racism, prejudice, redemption – and also presents the stark reality that a lot of youths are facing in America these days (and not necessarily just the minorities). In particular, I think it had just the right dosage of humour and the final resolution was also very well done.

I’ve still got plenty more to get through, including Milk, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Revolutionary Road, Doubt, Rachel Getting Married, Defiance – just to name a few.  I’m trying to get to them as soon as I can…

2009 NBA All-Star Starters announced: my take

January 23, 2009 in NBA

The starters for the 2009 NBA All-Star Game in Phoenix have been announced.  The starters are as follows (2 guards, 2 forwards and a center for each conference):

Eastern Conference
allen_iversondwyane_wadelebron_jameskevin_garnettdwight_howard

G – Allen Iverson – 17.8ppg, 5.3apg, 1.65spg

G – Dwayne Wade – 28.8ppg, 4.9rpg, 7.3apg, 2.27spg, 1.54bpg

F – Lebron James – 27.8ppg, 7.2rpg, 6.8apg, 2.03spg, 1.25bpg

F – Kevin Garnett – 16.1ppg, 9.1rpg, 2.6apg, 1.23spg, 1.25bpg

C – Dwight Howard – 19.9ppg, 14.0rpg, 3.2bpg

Western Conference

chris_paulkobe_bryanttim_duncanamare_stoudemireyao_ming

G – Chris Paul – 21.1ppg, 5.5rpg, 11.0apg, 2.72spg

G – Kobe Bryant – 26.4ppg, 5.6rpg, 5.2apg, 1.29spg

F – Tim Duncan – 20.4ppg, 10.2rpg, 3.5apg, 1.83bpg

F – Amare Stoudemire – 21.3ppg, 8.0rpg, 2.2apg, 1.08spg, 1.08bpg

C – Yao Ming – 19.9ppg, 9.6rpg, 1.69bpg

Comparing my picks

The line-ups were pretty similar to my picks.  However, my methodology was based more on merit (ie who I thought deserved it most), so there were a few differences.

Read the rest of this entry →

Bad Behavior has blocked 584 access attempts in the last 7 days.